 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Album
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in| Search found 38 matches |
| Author | Message |
|---|---|
 Topic: Arab Conquest DAW 15 |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 2 Views: 6398 |
 Forum: Army Lists Posted: Wed May 30, 2007 1:25 pm Subject: Arab Conquest DAW 15 |
| The list works fine!
I think you have done a fine job on this one Scott! But then I have reason to do so. (No historical back up for the comment. Just stating that I like it) |
|
| Topic: Zvezda plastic miniatures, 1/72 scale |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 6 Views: 12876 |
Forum: Painting and Modeling Posted: Wed May 23, 2007 1:30 pm Subject: Zvezda plastic miniatures, 1/72 scale |
| I agree whole heartedly with Frank here.
What matters more is how cohesive your force looks. It really doesn't matter if you look like a bunch of dwarfs. I remember a game at Bill Low's house w ... |
|
| Topic: Shield Transfers |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 11 Views: 17752 |
Forum: Painting and Modeling Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 5:03 pm Subject: Shield Transfers |
| HAH!
Just hold your head high and proclaim loudly to the universe that women's makeup tools are indeed useful for manly things! 
LOL I skulk through those sections too. 
Mak ... |
|
| Topic: Shield Transfers |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 11 Views: 17752 |
Forum: Painting and Modeling Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 6:48 pm Subject: Shield Transfers |
| CVS Scot.
Just go looking in the makeup section. They actually have a rather large selection of neat items for getting fiddly bits to do what you want them to. |
|
| Topic: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 9 Views: 11351 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 4:47 pm Subject: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
| Oh it doesn't come from that Jon!
Plus I don't use flammable animals! 
The war dog thing could have been an issue. I agree that expendables in column is laughable. Still the question need ... |
|
| Topic: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 9 Views: 11351 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 4:05 pm Subject: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
| Excellent!
Just thought of a few other areas where issues could arise: 1 Spanish war dogs. The list rule says they move as LMI (Or LI don't have it in front of me) However they contain animals ... |
|
| Topic: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 9 Views: 11351 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 3:43 pm Subject: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
| OK just to be completely clear on this then.
As the unit is moving it must remain in column. Can the unit perform a formation change out of column while in Woods as long as it does not move be ... |
|
| Topic: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 9 Views: 11351 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Wed May 02, 2007 1:16 pm Subject: Dismounted Infantry and the new Clarifications |
| 6.7 (pg 65-66). Add: “A body that includes animals voluntarily moving (including maneuvering) in or into a very rough area must be and remain in column."
Does this apply to dismounted infantr ... |
|
| Topic: Obstacle Question |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 24 Views: 25683 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Tue May 01, 2007 3:58 pm Subject: Obstacle Question |
| Very Elegant.
Thank you Jon. |
|
| Topic: Army Selection/List Advice |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 18 Views: 11479 |
Forum: Army Lists Posted: Wed Apr 18, 2007 3:37 am Subject: Re: More bad advice! :) |
| First, let me jump in with everyone else and praise your painting. Are you inking the togas of the figs and using decals on the shields? I've tried painting late roman shield patterns free hand and ... | |
| Topic: Army Selection/List Advice |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 18 Views: 11479 |
Forum: Army Lists Posted: Tue Apr 17, 2007 8:20 pm Subject: Army Selection/List Advice |
| Lose to Derek repeatedly.
Then lose to Steve. Then lose to Jamie. NO NO NO! Ummm Wait... Yes moving to Jacksonville is a GREAT idea. 
I think Scot's suggestion is perhaps the best o ... |
|
| Topic: Echelon, again |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 42 Views: 44419 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Tue Apr 10, 2007 5:57 pm Subject: Echelon, again |
| Hey!
Tim is old enough to be my DAD! 
Sibling indeed. Kidding aside. We have definitely turned a new leaf. Primarily with your mental stability in mind. |
|
| Topic: Echelon, again |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 42 Views: 44419 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Fri Apr 06, 2007 2:52 am Subject: Echelon, again |
| Thanks Jon,
I think I deeply misunderstood how to execute charges. I made the assumption that reactions to charges could occur before the actual charge move was made. It appears that that is real ... |
|
| Topic: Echelon, again |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 42 Views: 44419 |
Forum: Rules Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 11:04 pm Subject: Echelon, again |
| Assume three units:
Player A: 3 wide x 2 deep loose foot block Player B: 2 x 2 close block 2 x 2 close block One close unit is steady, and the other close unit is shaken and 5 paces behind an ... |
|
| Topic: Fedual Warrior List #30 |
|
| Ambrose Coddington Replies: 5 Views: 9628 |
Forum: Army Lists Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2007 10:11 pm Subject: Fedual Warrior List #30 |
| I personally would take Frank's comments on list design of the 100 YWE very seriously.
He has won the teams at least 3 times with them along with Dave Styers. I have had the dubious distinction ... |
|
All times are GMT |
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group