Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

So long as the player derives no benefit and the game is played as though a base
is correct depth, using DBM based bow as close order is ok from a rules
standpoint. As far as how you play in your basement or at your local tourney,
that is up to you.

As I thought. The original question was from Doug, about whether any lists
had both MI (based as DBM Bw) and LMI (ditto) in the same army. My New
Kingdom Egyptians fit that bill. My "line" archers (Ral Partha) are
distinct figures from my "Marine" archers (Foundry and Black Tree/Icon), and
I feel I am covered against charges of un-natural acts if I make the
distinction clear at the appropriate time where types are declared, and try
to take no unwarranted advantages.
John



> -----Original Message-----
> From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 24, 2002 1:07 PM
> To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: [WarriorRules] base depths for bows & use of DBM
> based figs
>
>
> So long as the player derives no benefit and the game is played
> as though a base is correct depth, using DBM based bow as close
> order is ok from a rules standpoint. As far as how you play in
> your basement or at your local tourney, that is up to you.
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

[joncleaves]

<<I feel I am covered against charges of un-natural acts if I make the
distinction clear at the appropriate time where types are declared, and try to
take no unwarranted advantages.
John>>

I would certainly concur with that. FWIW.
Jon