View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 112
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 5:57 pm Post subject: embarrassing rules question - LEHI |
 |
|
I'm sure I'm just being stupid . . . . *but*
QUESTION
LEHI are loose EXCEPT when shooting and in combat; in those two cases they are
considered close order. Yes?
ISSUES
The three major effects of this being: 1) irreg shoot as 4 figs/element 2) -2 in
HTH for
disorder 3) no waver check from mounted charge
I went through the archives and found a lot of discussion of LEHI but not of
this specific
question. Everyone else (to my embarrassment) seems to know the answer.
Jonathan
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Mar 02, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: Re: embarrassing rules question - LEHI |
 |
|
They are never considered close order.
They are EHI for weapon factors only. They do not take a -2 for being
disordered and they are vulnerable to a mounted charge in the open. Irr LEHI is
3 figs.
Jon
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan <ccoutoftown@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:57:13 -0000
Subject: [WarriorRules] embarrassing rules question - LEHI
I'm sure I'm just being stupid . . . . *but*
QUESTION
LEHI are loose EXCEPT when shooting and in combat; in those two cases they are
considered close order. Yes?
ISSUES
The three major effects of this being: 1) irreg shoot as 4 figs/element 2) -2 in
HTH for
disorder 3) no waver check from mounted charge
I went through the archives and found a lot of discussion of LEHI but not of
this specific
question. Everyone else (to my embarrassment) seems to know the answer.
Jonathan
Yahoo! Groups Links
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 1:41 am Post subject: Re: Re: embarrassing rules question - LEHI |
 |
|
In a message dated 3/2/2006 21:39:58 Central Standard Time,
ccoutoftown@... writes:
LEHI are just like LHI and LMI. They use the same factor columns as EHI, HI
and MI.
[
No, just EHI
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 112
|
Posted: Fri Mar 03, 2006 6:38 am Post subject: Re: embarrassing rules question - LEHI |
 |
|
Got it.
LEHI are just like LHI and LMI. They use the same factor columns as EHI, HI and
MI.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@... wrote:
>
> They are never considered close order.
>
> They are EHI for weapon factors only. They do not take a -2 for being
disordered and
they are vulnerable to a mounted charge in the open. Irr LEHI is 3 figs.
>
> Jon
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jonathan <ccoutoftown@...>
> To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 14:57:13 -0000
> Subject: [WarriorRules] embarrassing rules question - LEHI
>
>
> I'm sure I'm just being stupid . . . . *but*
>
> QUESTION
> LEHI are loose EXCEPT when shooting and in combat; in those two cases they are
> considered close order. Yes?
>
>
> ISSUES
> The three major effects of this being: 1) irreg shoot as 4 figs/element 2) -2
in
> HTH for
> disorder 3) no waver check from mounted charge
>
> I went through the archives and found a lot of discussion of LEHI but not of
> this specific
> question. Everyone else (to my embarrassment) seems to know the answer.
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|