 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Chris Bump Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2001 2:56 am Post subject: Fwd: Flank March Thought #2 |
 |
|
Jon/ Scott,
This is a fabulous idea. It involves minimum changing of rules, changes play
virtually none, and eliminates that aspect of flank marches that all who were
arguing for fog of war rolls for hated about anouncing arrival prior to
arrival with die rolls.
Sometimes simplicity really does solve the problems best. I hope that you
will consider this approach.
Chris
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
User-Agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
From: jncsmom@...
Mailing-List: list WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com; contact WarriorRules-owner@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 02:25:15 -0000
Subject: [WarriorRules] Flank March Thought #2
OK.....So after I read what I wrote I realized I was not very clear.
What I meant to say is that we should eliminate a special roll just
for flank marches and simply say that if you get a 5 or 6 on your
initiative roll your flank march arrives on that same turn. Since
both players have to roll for initiative each and every turn it would
not be obvious (at least from the die rolling) that there was an
impending flank march. If a 5 or 6 is rolled then the player simply
announces where the flank march is arriving or states that he does
not have a flank march. I usually refrain from the rules bantor
becuase I usually do not see all of the nuances and impacts which you
all catch. So if this some how throws off play balance or something
then PLEASE blow it out of the water.
Keegan
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scott holder Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6077 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Mon Apr 30, 2001 3:20 pm Post subject: Re: Fwd: Flank March Thought #2 |
 |
|
This is a fabulous idea. It involves minimum changing of rules, changes play
virtually none, and eliminates that aspect of flank marches that all who were
arguing for fog of war rolls for hated about anouncing arrival prior to
arrival with die rolls.
Sometimes simplicity really does solve the problems best. I hope that you
will consider this approach.
>Um, Jon might but I won't. For starters, I'm not a big fan of eliminating
dice rolls as they currently exist in Warrior. Sorry but that's simply a
different philisophical perspective on rules that was provided by the original
posting. I've always felt that anyone who wanted a wholely "deterministic"
game, shouldn't be playing ancients. As for the "fog of war" issue, I've made
my point clear previously as has Jon. Any flank march rule that isn't what is
currently used will be an x-rule.
>Sorry,
Scott
List Ho
_________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|