Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

List Question Later Polish List 19 Feudal Warrior

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Charles Yaw
Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 194

PostPosted: Sat Jul 30, 2005 6:54 pm    Post subject: List Question Later Polish List 19 Feudal Warrior


Scott,

The Notes in List 19, Feudal Warrior, state: "Mounted Polish Generals
in the Late Period must be SHK and if any Polish Knights are upgraded
to SHK, then at least one Polish general must also be SHK.

The upgrades on page 37 make no provision for this. Both read -
Middle period line 2 and Late period line 2 "Extra to upgrade any
Szlachta Knights to SHK @ 9 pts." Shouldn't the following line be
added to both - 6 pts if General's element?

This is not covered in the list updates.

Thanks,

Charles

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
scott holder
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6066
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO

PostPosted: Mon Aug 01, 2005 4:16 pm    Post subject: Re: List Question Later Polish List 19 Feudal Warrior


I'll have an answer for you in the next two weeks.


--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "riderofrohan2001" <yaw@m...>
wrote:
>
> Scott,
>
> The Notes in List 19, Feudal Warrior, state: "Mounted Polish
Generals
> in the Late Period must be SHK and if any Polish Knights are
upgraded
> to SHK, then at least one Polish general must also be SHK.
>
> The upgrades on page 37 make no provision for this. Both read -
> Middle period line 2 and Late period line 2 "Extra to upgrade any
> Szlachta Knights to SHK @ 9 pts." Shouldn't the following line be
> added to both - 6 pts if General's element?
>
> This is not covered in the list updates.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Charles


_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message   Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group