Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 12/19/2003 16:47:17 Central Standard Time,
davidsmith@... writes:
Rather than DBM 4.0 it will be a new system that will,
perhaps supplant DBM. It will be available in about a year.

I bring this up, only because it might open the door for those
disgruntled DBM gamers that have gone through several iterations of
that system to take a look or re-look at Warrior. There has been
some mild controversy on the other Yahoo group regarding this news,
and it has not been met with universal acceptance.
As with any PB game, the second DBMM is out the door, company support for DBM
will erode and eventually become 0.

I agree with you Dave - this is an error on their part that we should
capitalize on. But more importantly, it is a gret time to remind our players
that we
will never do this. Sure, there is some language I dislike in Warrior that I
plan to rewrite in the reprint, but we aren't changing anything.

For example, their discussed change of having Cv die to Sp/Pk in the foot's
bound is a massive change that will severely impact on army choice. We are
certainly never going to do anything like that....lol

Jon


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Dave Smith]

Greetings;

With the various threads regarding tourneys and attendance, it might
be of interest that Phil Barker has selected a few players to tweak
a new(er) system called DBMM De Bellis Master Militum or something
like that. Rather than DBM 4.0 it will be a new system that will,
perhaps supplant DBM. It will be available in about a year.

I bring this up, only because it might open the door for those
disgruntled DBM gamers that have gone through several iterations of
that system to take a look or re-look at Warrior. There has been
some mild controversy on the other Yahoo group regarding this news,
and it has not been met with universal acceptance.

Oh for the good ole days when everyone played 6th Edition in 25mm
(or at least I thought they did). :^)