| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
joncleaves
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Posts: 16447
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 8:56 pm Post subject: Re: Reg B HI |
 |
|
I take Reg B HI all the time. Hasn't seemed to hurt. :)
_________________
Roll Up and Win! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Don Coon
Imperator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2742
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2002 8:59 pm Post subject: Re: Reg B HI |
|
|
> Y'know, by this point I actually went back and checked. Nowehere do I
> make a statement of the type Jon attacks here; the closest I come is in
> suggesting that Reg B HI units are overpriced by comparison with other
> close foot, and is anyone actually running an army of Reg B HI? Gee,
> really, no-one? Wonder why.
I ran EIR for a while. Many Reg B HI (HTW+Sh). When I got the stuff to go
to MIR, I went in a flash as the multiple armed Reg B MI (HTW,JLS,D+Sh)
legionaires are much better bang for the buck IMHO. If the list gives me an
option I almost always go for MI over HI.
Don and his .02
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Don Coon
Imperator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2742
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2002 1:03 am Post subject: Re: Reg B HI |
|
|
I am not saying it hurt me either (I love my "B's"). I play HI and like it.
I prefer them to be "B" as well. I was only offering one mans opinion and
choice. I moved away from singley armed REG B HI, in favor of multiply
armed REG B MI at the same cost per stand. It seems to me to be a more
productive troop type for my style of play.
Not trying to make a point or reinforce anyone elses point. Only stating my
choice  .
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Reg B HI
> I take Reg B HI all the time. Hasn't seemed to hurt. :)
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Album
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
