Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Todd Schneider]

Well, in answer to Jon’s post, here’s the two lists I am considering for
May.

Both are Late Imperial Romans. Both are 1200 Points



CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157

Hunnic Ally General 2E Irr B HC L, B, Sh @ 125



Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh

Equites 2E Reg C HC JLS, Sh



2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130

Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 146

Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122



2x Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81



Hunnic Noble Cav 2E HC Irr B L, B, Sh



Total 1201



The Other list is very Similar.



CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157

Sub General 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 107

Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh



2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130

2x Auxila 6E Reg C 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122

Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81

Alans 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81



2x Cataphract Clibinarii 2E Reg C EHC L, B, Sh



Total 1192





With both lists I am thinking of dropping one of the LC units. I could then
use the points for morale upgrades to the Legions in both lists, or buy
another Noble Cav unit in the first Unit, or a 3rd Clib unit in the 3rd.



I am not an aggressive player, and my experience with Romans is that they
aren’t an aggressive army, but are a good “counterpunching” Army that fits
my style of play better. For the moment, I prefer the 6E units over the 4E
units, because I find them a bit more durable and flexible on the tabletop.



I have a Marian List I like (well, and a Mithradatic List as well ) but
I’ve committed to playing LIR in Kansas City in May.






---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Todd my only comment is that I would not mix the Auxillia B with the
other Auxillia. Of course I know this is an opion with EIR, and I am
not familiar with the LIR enough to know if this is possible.

If it is, the reason is so that your LMI J/sh guys (your foot
punch/counterpunch) if mixed with the B will draw fire. You want
the legionares to do this as much as possible. If separate, the LMI
B can work with the weak cavalry to open up some charge
opportunities. If you can get enemy mounted disordered by shooting,
then impetouosly charging 1.5 rank Hun LC will actually be a frontal
threat to most of what you'll meet in a theme event except perhaps
EHC.

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Todd Schneider"
<thresh1642@s...> wrote:
> Well, in answer to Jon's post, here's the two lists I am
considering for
> May.
>
> Both are Late Imperial Romans. Both are 1200 Points
>
>
>
> CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157
>
> Hunnic Ally General 2E Irr B HC L, B, Sh @ 125
>
>
>
> Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh
>
> Equites 2E Reg C HC JLS, Sh
>
>
>
> 2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130
>
> Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 146
>
> Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122
>
>
>
> 2x Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81
>
>
>
> Hunnic Noble Cav 2E HC Irr B L, B, Sh
>
>
>
> Total 1201
>
>
>
> The Other list is very Similar.
>
>
>
> CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157
>
> Sub General 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 107
>
> Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh
>
>
>
> 2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130
>
> 2x Auxila 6E Reg C 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122
>
> Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81
>
> Alans 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81
>
>
>
> 2x Cataphract Clibinarii 2E Reg C EHC L, B, Sh
>
>
>
> Total 1192
>
>
>
>
>
> With both lists I am thinking of dropping one of the LC units. I
could then
> use the points for morale upgrades to the Legions in both lists, or
buy
> another Noble Cav unit in the first Unit, or a 3rd Clib unit in the
3rd.
>
>
>
> I am not an aggressive player, and my experience with Romans is
that they
> aren't an aggressive army, but are a good "counterpunching" Army
that fits
> my style of play better. For the moment, I prefer the 6E units
over the 4E
> units, because I find them a bit more durable and flexible on the
tabletop.
>
>
>
> I have a Marian List I like (well, and a Mithradatic List as well 8-
) ) but
> I've committed to playing LIR in Kansas City in May.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004
>
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Todd,

Looks pretty solid. I like the Reg D infantry but would consider upgrading
1 element to "C" class for a total of 4 points per unit. That way you won't have
to worry about waiver tests if you have to prompt them to charge when your
orders aren't attack or if it's after their first charge is used up.

kelly

Todd Schneider <thresh1642@...> wrote:
Well, in answer to Jon’s post, here’s the two lists I am considering for
May.

Both are Late Imperial Romans. Both are 1200 Points



CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157

Hunnic Ally General 2E Irr B HC L, B, Sh @ 125



Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh

Equites 2E Reg C HC JLS, Sh



2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130

Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 146

Auxila 6E Reg B 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122



2x Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81



Hunnic Noble Cav 2E HC Irr B L, B, Sh



Total 1201



The Other list is very Similar.



CinC 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 157

Sub General 2E ½ Reg A, ½ Reg B HC, JLS, Sh @ 107

Equites Illyricani 4E LC Reg C JLS, Sh



2x Legionaries 6E MI Reg D HTW, JLS, D, Sh @ 130

2x Auxila 6E Reg C 2/3rd JLS, D, Sh; 1/3 B, Sh @ 122

Huns 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81

Alans 4E LC Irr C Jls, B, Sh @ 81



2x Cataphract Clibinarii 2E Reg C EHC L, B, Sh



Total 1192





With both lists I am thinking of dropping one of the LC units. I could then
use the points for morale upgrades to the Legions in both lists, or buy
another Noble Cav unit in the first Unit, or a 3rd Clib unit in the 3rd.



I am not an aggressive player, and my experience with Romans is that they
aren’t an aggressive army, but are a good “counterpunching” Army that fits
my style of play better. For the moment, I prefer the 6E units over the 4E
units, because I find them a bit more durable and flexible on the tabletop.



I have a Marian List I like (well, and a Mithradatic List as well ) but
I’ve committed to playing LIR in Kansas City in May.






---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004



---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.624 / Virus Database: 401 - Release Date: 3/15/2004



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Small Business $15K Web Design Giveaway - Enter today

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]