Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

scott holder · Posted: Sat May 17, 2008 12:10 am Post subject: New Clarifications Up

Scroll down and download the newest clarifications. They are also available on the FHE website in Word and Text versions.

Only Word version here.

scott

Frank Gilson · Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 5:46 pm Post subject: Questions

"• If the parent is the moving body at the time of combination, the parent is placed in the position of the detachment in the formation it is in and at its current width in elements. The detachment then forms the rear rank(s) of the new combined unit.”

I take it, given Jon's earlier commentary, that "at its current width" has "its" referring to "the detachment" and NOT to "the parent"? This is a 'little' weird as the parent may not be able to assume the width of the detachment. What is done in such a case?

Frank

Frank Gilson · Posted: Tue May 20, 2008 6:01 pm Post subject: incendiaries, other rules section

17.1 (page 136): Under INCENDIARIES, ETC. 5th Sentence: Change “OF EITHER SIDE.” To OF THE OPPOSING SIDE.”

This change also needs to be made to rule 14.46 at the end.

Frank

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

True.

Consider that official.

J

scott holder · Posted: Thu May 22, 2008 5:27 pm Post subject:

The file has been updated to reflect the above. Word version available down below. Word and Text available on the FHE webpage.

If you've downloaded since these were first posted, download again.

scott

Frank Gilson · Posted: Tue May 27, 2008 5:26 pm Post subject: what about my 1st question?

Look at my first post here...there are a couple of detachment/parent issues I was asking about there...apologies if you're aware of it and still ruminating.

FrankG

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

If it cannot be done, then it cannot be done. If, for example, the det is 8E wide and the parent is 6E total, then something would have to change before they could be combined in that manner.

Frank Gilson · Posted: Wed May 28, 2008 9:25 pm Post subject: ok...so...then...

Ok...so, taking the clarifications and your statement here...if a parent body wants to join a detachment, the detachment must be no wider than the parent body COULD be...the parent body then widens to occupy the frontage that the detachment did.

If the detachment is too wide, then they can't join.

Got it...

Frank