Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

fourho · Site Admin Joined: 28 Mar 2006 Posts: 13

We're looking at different ways of potentially delivering any revised army lists to y'all. So please take a few minutes to answer the questions. I can only have one question per post so there will be several.

In this first one, I'd like to point out the pros and cons of the approach (read the poll question first).

Current Method Pro: Familiar; Only have to have books you're interested in.

Current Method Con: Lots of books to lug around, non-standard list numbering between Warrior and Fast Warrior/Warrior Battles.

Merged Pro: New standard numbering/format between games; Less books.

Merged Con: Less familiar; More overlap for those people who specialize.

Thanks for you time!

scott (posting under the admin account since the database gets all wierd on me if I give my account moderator rights in here)

Todd Kaeser · Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:26 pm Post subject:

I totally understand that w/ all the revisions new books will need to be published. Please remember that many of us have already spent 100+ on the old books and then would have to pay for the new. I also understand that you have to pay to make these books and we should cover that cost, but please be aware of what we've already spent please.

Sincerely and Respectfully,

Todd K

Ewan McNay · Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:47 pm Post subject:

The other question is: once electronic, why .pdf? Clearly pirating is not a concern (because uncontrollable), so why not allow for easier edits down the line? Sure, some folks will be able to edit .pdfs - but I doubt that's a majority and in any case why not just .txt (or if you must, .doc)?

Ed Kollmer · Centurion Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1018

Ok, Ok

You are dealing with me. Rolling Eyes

I have read the three questions
I have ONE simple question.
How do I vote.

I don't see anything that looks like a vote key.
Sorry for the ignorance, but there is always one in the crowd and I am he.
Ed the confused