| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Ewan McNay
Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2777
Location: Albany, NY, US
|
 Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 1:04 am Post subject: Interpenetration language |
 |
|
In another thread, Frank Gilson said:
| Quote: |
"Troops can interpenetrate another friendly body directly to their front or rear in any of the following circumstances:"
mean?
The word "their" refers to the initial "Troops" and not to "another friendly body". |
I completely agree; can we have confirmation (or denial) that we're correct? Thanks![/quote] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ed Kollmer
Centurion
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1018
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
could I have the rest of the quote.
What "circumstances"
Ed the Ignorant |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ewan McNay
Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 2777
Location: Albany, NY, US
|
| Posted: Mon Oct 05, 2015 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ed - that just constrains permitted troop combinations; 'any mounted through any light' and that kind of stuff. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ed Kollmer
Centurion
Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 1018
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 2:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
AHHH.....I begin to see said the Blind man to the Deaf man
Ed the Blind |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scott holder
Moderator
Joined: 30 Mar 2006
Posts: 6055
Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
| Posted: Sat Jul 22, 2023 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Frank's quote is how I've been ruling on this for some time now. Thus, it's correct.
We may or may not revisit this, ie., make both units have a front/back requirement, down the line.
scott
_________________
These Rules Suck, Let's Paint! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Usergroups
Album
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
