Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 11/15/2003 22:27:38 Central Standard Time,
miccomslave@... writes:
One more question does FW use "less rules' or a simplification of
the main Warrior rules?
Yes - a great many of the Warrior rules are not used in FW.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> Michael
>
> Warrior is our ancient and medieval rules set. It contains a set
of 276 army
> lists and rules to play smaller games (1.5 hours to finish, 15mm:
3'x2'
> table, 25mm 4'x3' table) called Fast Warrior. Fast Warrior armies
are *about*
> twice the size of DBA armies (24 or so elements).
>
> Warrior is available (and more information about it can be found)
at our
> website:
>
> www.fourhorsemenenterprises.com
>
> Jon
>
Thanks Jon
I have found a supplier in melbounre Oz
I will buy a copy
One more question does FW use "less rules' or a simplification of
the main Warrior rules? thanks regards michael
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hi all
I have just recieced a copy of warrrior with the intention of
getting a couple of others into it,but am after some help
What rules do you use for FW? I was told a lot of the standard
warrior rules were not used which is good because my tired brain
cannot digest 100 odd pages of rules.
Also is there an early swiss FW list where the halberd was the
prefered weapon?
Any help would be great
regards michael.

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 11/22/2003 03:02:09 Central Standard Time,
miccomslave@... writes:
What rules do you use for FW? I was told a lot of the standard
warrior rules were not used which is good because my tired brain
cannot digest 100 odd pages of rules.
Fast Warrior isn't 'simple Warrior' - it just plays a lot faster. If you
want simple, you'll have to wait for Warrior Battles.
In playing Fast Warrior, you do not use most of rule 4.0 as there is only one
command and I have yet to see an orders change in a FW game. You do not use
the ambush, forced march or flank march portion of 14.0. If you and your
opponents stay away from chariots, elephants, fighting transport, artillery and
temporary fortification, you can do with out all of 13.0 and 16.0 except for the
portion that covers your baggage camp.
But to play Fast Warrior, you will have to know 3.0 and 5.0-12.0.

Also is there an early swiss FW list where the halberd was the
prefered weapon?
Any help would be great
If you don't want to use the FW Swiss list, you can make a one-command force
for 650 points out of the Swiss list in Feudal Warrior for the time period you
desire.

Jon


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 11/22/2003 03:02:09 Central Standard Time,
> miccomslave@h... writes:

Thanks for your help Jon
I must purchase Feudalwarrior lists
regards michael


> What rules do you use for FW? I was told a lot of the standard
> warrior rules were not used which is good because my tired brain
> cannot digest 100 odd pages of rules.
> Fast Warrior isn't 'simple Warrior' - it just plays a lot faster.
If you
> want simple, you'll have to wait for Warrior Battles.
> In playing Fast Warrior, you do not use most of rule 4.0 as there
is only one
> command and I have yet to see an orders change in a FW game. You
do not use
> the ambush, forced march or flank march portion of 14.0. If you
and your
> opponents stay away from chariots, elephants, fighting transport,
artillery and
> temporary fortification, you can do with out all of 13.0 and 16.0
except for the
> portion that covers your baggage camp.
> But to play Fast Warrior, you will have to know 3.0 and 5.0-12.0.
>
> Also is there an early swiss FW list where the halberd was the
> prefered weapon?
> Any help would be great
> If you don't want to use the FW Swiss list, you can make a one-
command force
> for 650 points out of the Swiss list in Feudal Warrior for the
time period you
> desire.
>
> Jon
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Ed Forbes]

Jon,

Can this option of using a 650 pt command in lieu of the published list
be used for all the other lists? Probably not much difference for most
lists after minimums are taken into account, but may give a different
feel to several other lists.

I assume that cost is for a C&C and all minimums apply.

Ed


> If you don't want to use the FW Swiss list, you can make a
> one-command force
> for 650 points out of the Swiss list in Feudal Warrior for the time
> period you
> desire.
>
> Jon
>

________________________________________________________________
The best thing to hit the internet in years - Juno SpeedBand!
Surf the web up to FIVE TIMES FASTER!
Only $14.95/ month - visit www.juno.com to sign up today!

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 11/23/2003 22:41:23 Central Standard Time,
eforbes100@... writes:
Jon,

Can this option of using a 650 pt command in lieu of the published list
be used for all the other lists? Probably not much difference for most
lists after minimums are taken into account, but may give a different
feel to several other lists.
Sure, but any tourney someone runs should either allow 650 point lists OR the
lists published in the book. The lists in the book are balanced to each
other in period, but we can't make any guarantee where they'd stack up in a
completely open event.


I assume that cost is for a C&C and all minimums apply.

Ed
Yes. One CINC and no other generals. CINC is in a unit not a staff element
alone. Minimums apply.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]