 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Don Coon Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2742
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 1:48 pm Post subject: Re: Re: 1E vs 2E+ generals |
 |
|
I agree. I tend to run my Roman commanders as 1E though. It reminds me to
keep them the heck away from the fight, plus it allows me to join my arty
and direct fire.
> I think you have to go with 2 elements if you are a Knight or SHC! Those
bodyguards are to dang expensive to not be earning their pay winning the
battle for you!
>
> Kelly
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 7:50 pm Post subject: Re: Re: 1E vs 2E+ generals |
 |
|
Don,
That's also historical as well. Seldom do you hear of Roman commanders
coming out to accept a 1 on 1 combat with the enemy general. It just was not
done.
Kelly
jjendon@... wrote:
I agree. I tend to run my Roman commanders as 1E though. It reminds me to
keep them the heck away from the fight, plus it allows me to join my arty
and direct fire.
> I think you have to go with 2 elements if you are a Knight or SHC! Those
bodyguards are to dang expensive to not be earning their pay winning the
battle for you!
>
> Kelly
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll down and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|