Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Scott,

Can you explain to me why in the Berber list, Andulusian foot
can be upgraded to Reg C but not in the Main Andulusian list? Why is
that? Is this an oversight?

kelly Wilkinson

[Bill Low]

If you feel like explaining, you might consider pointing out that the
Andalusians in the Berber list are essentially refugees, uprooted from
their homeland, and fighting (and living) in a different place. While not
a direct answer, it may serve to uncouple the two groups, and break the
assumption that they were the same, and acted the same, because we use the
same name for them.


At 02:30 AM 7/22/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Can you explain to me why in the Berber list, Andulusian foot
> can be upgraded to Reg C but not in the Main Andulusian list? Why is
> that? Is this an oversight?
>
> kelly Wilkinson
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-----------------------------------------------------
From Harold William Low

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Bill, Scott,
I really don't require much of an explanation. I just worded my question
poorly. I was just wondering why the Andulusian national list wouldn't be able
to upgrade when they used Berber allies since they can be upgraded in the Berber
list when allied in the early period. That's really all. Thanks for replying
Bill.
On another point, can the Berber HC L, Sh be upgraded as the LC and Camels
to Irrg A? The line says Berber Cavalry may be upgraded but gives no point value
for the upgraded HC. Thanks again Bill for your response!
Kelly

Bill Low <lowclan@...> wrote:
If you feel like explaining, you might consider pointing out that the
Andalusians in the Berber list are essentially refugees, uprooted from
their homeland, and fighting (and living) in a different place. While not
a direct answer, it may serve to uncouple the two groups, and break the
assumption that they were the same, and acted the same, because we use the
same name for them.


At 02:30 AM 7/22/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> Scott,
>
> Can you explain to me why in the Berber list, Andulusian foot
> can be upgraded to Reg C but not in the Main Andulusian list? Why is
> that? Is this an oversight?
>
> kelly Wilkinson
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
-----------------------------------------------------
From Harold William Low


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]