Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

Yes, Ewan, somehow I got the feeling #3 was not going to be very popular with
players, which is why I am doing this. The one mistake I will attempt NOT to
make is the GW method of designing games primarily the way the designers want
them played without first priority to the players. If there are multiple
opinions, I have no problem deciding 'our' way. But if the players
overwhelmingly don't want something we were going to include, that needs to
be looked at hard.
Seems #3 might fall in that category.
If, after the results are in (no recounts!) we split #1 and #2, the FH will
decide amongst themselves which one to go with, but I would not force #3 on
the players.

option 1
simple is best
nic lobbenberg

No recounts? Not even if the intent of the voters can be reasonably
extrapolated through independent review by a board non-partisan wargaming
experts with the specific purpose and authority to examine any and all votes
containing hanging participles? How undemocratic?

Sorry, I couldn't help it.


Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 10:43 AM
To: ewan.mcnay@...
Cc: WarriorRules@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Angled charges and pivoting to conform (fwd)


Yes, Ewan, somehow I got the feeling #3 was not going to be very popular
with
players, which is why I am doing this. The one mistake I will attempt NOT
to
make is the GW method of designing games primarily the way the designers
want
them played without first priority to the players. If there are multiple
opinions, I have no problem deciding 'our' way. But if the players
overwhelmingly don't want something we were going to include, that needs to
be looked at hard.
Seems #3 might fall in that category.
If, after the results are in (no recounts!) we split #1 and #2, the FH will
decide amongst themselves which one to go with, but I would not force #3 on
the players.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com

[Greg Regets]

There will be a recount, but it will be handled on a list by list basis.

Greg ~who couldn't resist either~

-----Original Message-----
From: Santos, Kevin [mailto:ksantos@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 9:53 AM
To: 'WarriorRules@egroups.com'
Subject: RE: [WarriorRules] Angled charges and pivoting to conform (fwd)


No recounts? Not even if the intent of the voters can be reasonably
extrapolated through independent review by a board non-partisan wargaming
experts with the specific purpose and authority to examine any and all votes
containing hanging participles? How undemocratic?

Sorry, I couldn't help it.


Kevin

-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 10:43 AM
To: ewan.mcnay@...
Cc: WarriorRules@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Angled charges and pivoting to conform (fwd)


Yes, Ewan, somehow I got the feeling #3 was not going to be very popular
with
players, which is why I am doing this. The one mistake I will attempt NOT
to
make is the GW method of designing games primarily the way the designers
want
them played without first priority to the players. If there are multiple
opinions, I have no problem deciding 'our' way. But if the players
overwhelmingly don't want something we were going to include, that needs to
be looked at hard.
Seems #3 might fall in that category.
If, after the results are in (no recounts!) we split #1 and #2, the FH will
decide amongst themselves which one to go with, but I would not force #3 on
the players.

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com