Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Scott,

In preparation for Cold Wars, I have a question and correction for the
Khwarizmian army list (# 30) in Holy Warrior. I did not see this mentioned
on the Four Horsemen Holy Warrior updates/corrections page.

Correction:

The point cost for adding LTS to the Afghan MI is incorrectly given as 3
points instead of 4 (or the intention is to give LTS to the LMI, in which
case it is noted incorrectly)

Question:

There is an upgrade of 0-1/general to allow the Lancers to upgrade to Reg A
as bodyguard. The Sub-generals are considered to be Reg B. If one were to
upgrade a second element of a sub-general's unit to Reg A, it would do no
good unless that element were placed in the front rank (which I think is not
allowed). Is it also possible to upgrade the Sub-General's element to Reg A?

Thanks.

-- Charles

[scott holder]

I'll get back to ya next week on this (I'm gone after today until sometime lat
e next Monday).

>>> clr198@... 01/08/03 11:23AM >>>
Scott,

In preparation for Cold Wars, I have a question and correction for the
Khwarizmian army list (# 30) in Holy Warrior. I did not see this mentioned
on the Four Horsemen Holy Warrior updates/corrections page.

Correction:

The point cost for adding LTS to the Afghan MI is incorrectly given as 3
points instead of 4 (or the intention is to give LTS to the LMI, in which
case it is noted incorrectly)

Question:

There is an upgrade of 0-1/general to allow the Lancers to upgrade to Reg A
as bodyguard. The Sub-generals are considered to be Reg B. If one were to
upgrade a second element of a sub-general's unit to Reg A, it would do no
good unless that element were placed in the front rank (which I think is not
allowed). Is it also possible to upgrade the Sub-General's element to Reg A?

Thanks.

-- Charles


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

[scott holder]

In preparation for Cold Wars, I have a question and correction for the
Khwarizmian army list (# 30) in Holy Warrior. I did not see this mentioned
on the Four Horsemen Holy Warrior updates/corrections page.

Correction:
The point cost for adding LTS to the Afghan MI is incorrectly given as 3
points instead of 4 (or the intention is to give LTS to the LMI, in which
case it is noted incorrectly)

>Argh! Yes, I'll make sure that gets onto the web page.

Question:
There is an upgrade of 0-1/general to allow the Lancers to upgrade to Reg A
as bodyguard. The Sub-generals are considered to be Reg B. If one were to
upgrade a second element of a sub-general's unit to Reg A, it would do no
good unless that element were placed in the front rank (which I think is not
allowed). Is it also possible to upgrade the Sub-General's element to Reg A?

>Unofficially, yes. Gimme a couple of hours (I'm at home today) and i'll have
this up on the web site and then it becomes "official".

>Thanks for catching these. Sigh.

scott
erratta ho

[scott holder]

Web site is now updated. I just finished Swiss, List 26. FeudWar lists that
remain are *relatively* easy to do but I still don't see us making a Cold Wars
publication date but do see things hitting the streets sometime this spring.

Bill is almost done with final NWW draft and we'll definitely have it online b
y the end of the month.

I have some interesting ideas relating to IW that I'll be sharing once the fir
st FeudWar draft is done with. These pertain to list rules and a "better" way
to simulate the "exists only on vugraph" (those of you who have worked Pentag
on military acquisition will know what I'm talking about) LIR scythe chariot (
I was gonna yank it but now feel we can leave it in but not have it be so doof
usly squirrly under the rules). But more on that later. Gotta make Medieval
German Princes readable:):)

>>> clr198@... 01/08/03 11:23AM >>>
Scott,

In preparation for Cold Wars, I have a question and correction for the
Khwarizmian army list (# 30) in Holy Warrior. I did not see this mentioned
on the Four Horsemen Holy Warrior updates/corrections page.

Correction:

The point cost for adding LTS to the Afghan MI is incorrectly given as 3
points instead of 4 (or the intention is to give LTS to the LMI, in which
case it is noted incorrectly)

Question:

There is an upgrade of 0-1/general to allow the Lancers to upgrade to Reg A
as bodyguard. The Sub-generals are considered to be Reg B. If one were to
upgrade a second element of a sub-general's unit to Reg A, it would do no
good unless that element were placed in the front rank (which I think is not
allowed). Is it also possible to upgrade the Sub-General's element to Reg A?

Thanks.

-- Charles


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/