Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Derek Downs]

We had this come up last game. A number of my friends units were fighting a
48 man MI JLS SH unit of mine. Due to the combat the 48 man unit stepped
forward when all the units recoiled except the smallest on the end which did not
recoil.

Another unit routed beside this combat. Does the small unit on the end count
as having enemy behind flank. It is fighting the large unit but the large unit
has steped forward so that it is now behind the flank of the smaller unit.

My question. Can a unit that is fighting another unit frontally also count
the same unit as behind its flank?

Derekcus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[joncleaves]

Derek, I am not understanding the situation. If one opponent of a body does not
recoil, then that body cannot follow up. Can I get a diagram?

I would say that if what I think you are describing were possible, then yes,
that body would be behind the enemy's flank.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: darnd022263@...
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, 7 Aug 2005 19:11:06 EDT
Subject: [WarriorRules] Behind Flank Question


We had this come up last game. A number of my friends units were fighting a
48 man MI JLS SH unit of mine. Due to the combat the 48 man unit stepped
forward when all the units recoiled except the smallest on the end which did not

recoil.

Another unit routed beside this combat. Does the small unit on the end count
as having enemy behind flank. It is fighting the large unit but the large unit
has steped forward so that it is now behind the flank of the smaller unit.

My question. Can a unit that is fighting another unit frontally also count
the same unit as behind its flank?

Derekcus


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]