Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

Greg, et al

We discussed this idea today and yes, not only will we look at the minimums in
the Biblical Warrior lists when we do the master list book, but we will consider
'improvements' where we find a list not acting according to its historical
record. I will never accept a look at a published list that makes it play
'worse', but we do agree that list rule state of the art might benefit BibWar
(and a few select other early lists).

J

[Greg Regets]

Thanks Jon ...

Please, again ... this is totally not a criticism of Biblican or any
othe rlist, nor is is saying that the new lists are "too good."

Exactly the opposite is true on the last point. It's nice to see a
company that is willing to make lists that will actually make lists
that excite players, rather than lists that make players spend hours
looking for a list that doesn't suck too bad!

Well done!

Now, if we could just fix the Byzantine cavalry. ;-)

g



--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> Greg, et al
>
> We discussed this idea today and yes, not only will we look at the
minimums in the Biblical Warrior lists when we do the master list
book, but we will consider 'improvements' where we find a list not
acting according to its historical record. I will never accept a
look at a published list that makes it play 'worse', but we do agree
that list rule state of the art might benefit BibWar (and a few
select other early lists).
>
> J

What would be nice to see added to it as a contemporous army is Northern
European Bronze Age & a Hjortspring Army. Just my two cents worth. I’ve
looked thru my books & didn’t find anything similar to it. If I’m incorrect
please correct me & accept my apologies.
Thanks,
Sven

-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2005 6:51 AM
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [WarriorRules] Biblical Warrior "Improvements"

Greg, et al

We discussed this idea today and yes, not only will we look at the minimums
in the Biblical Warrior lists when we do the master list book, but we will
consider 'improvements' where we find a list not acting according to its
historical record. I will never accept a look at a published list that
makes it play 'worse', but we do agree that list rule state of the art might
benefit BibWar (and a few select other early lists).

J


_____

Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Greg Regets]

Never make posts while drinking. ;-)

g



--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Greg Regets" <greg.regets@g...>
wrote:
>
> Thanks Jon ...
>
> Please, again ... this is totally not a criticism of Biblican or
any
> othe rlist, nor is is saying that the new lists are "too good."
>
> Exactly the opposite is true on the last point. It's nice to see a
> company that is willing to make lists that will actually make lists
> that excite players, rather than lists that make players spend
hours
> looking for a list that doesn't suck too bad!
>
> Well done!
>
> Now, if we could just fix the Byzantine cavalry.
>
> g
>
>
>
> --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> > Greg, et al
> >
> > We discussed this idea today and yes, not only will we look at
the
> minimums in the Biblical Warrior lists when we do the master list
> book, but we will consider 'improvements' where we find a list not
> acting according to its historical record. I will never accept a
> look at a published list that makes it play 'worse', but we do
agree
> that list rule state of the art might benefit BibWar (and a few
> select other early lists).
> >
> > J

[Kelly Wilkinson]

uummm.... Skirmishing EHC would be nice! LOL!

Greg Regets <greg.regets@...> wrote:
Thanks Jon ...

Please, again ... this is totally not a criticism of Biblican or any
othe rlist, nor is is saying that the new lists are "too good."

Exactly the opposite is true on the last point. It's nice to see a
company that is willing to make lists that will actually make lists
that excite players, rather than lists that make players spend hours
looking for a list that doesn't suck too bad!

Well done!

Now, if we could just fix the Byzantine cavalry. ;-)

g



--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> Greg, et al
>
> We discussed this idea today and yes, not only will we look at the
minimums in the Biblical Warrior lists when we do the master list
book, but we will consider 'improvements' where we find a list not
acting according to its historical record. I will never accept a
look at a published list that makes it play 'worse', but we do agree
that list rule state of the art might benefit BibWar (and a few
select other early lists).
>
> J





---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.




---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail - 250MB free storage. Do more. Manage less.

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]