Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Jon,

In Campaign Warrior you are allowed to replace city militia troops
with Ditched Palacades on a point by point basis.

Under 17.0 you are allowed to purchase incendiaries if your enemy's
list provides for temporary fortifications or fighting transport. Very
clear in a normal or tournament game; no so clear in a Campaign
Warrior situation.

Do we take the 17.0 as worded and not allow invaders incendiary
weapons unless the defender has temporary fortifications or fighting
transports specified on their list?

Thanks again,

Chris Tebo

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 3/19/2004 3:55:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
christebo@... writes:

> In Campaign Warrior you are allowed to replace city militia troops
> with Ditched Palacades on a point by point basis. >>

1/8 of settlement AP. Not exactly the same as what you said.

>
> Under 17.0 you are allowed to purchase incendiaries if your enemy's
> list provides for temporary fortifications or fighting transport. Very
> clear in a normal or tournament game; no so clear in a Campaign
> Warrior situation.
>
> Do we take the 17.0 as worded and not allow invaders incendiary
> weapons unless the defender has temporary fortifications or
> fighting
> transports specified on their list? >>

Correct, for flaming arrows for B and LB. And this has nothing to do with being
the 'invader', btw, which isn't a CamWar term.

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 3/19/2004 22:46:25 Central Standard Time,
greg.regets@... writes:
Since the Settlement player can buy Field Fortifications, does that
mean the other player can buy incendiaries?>>

Yes. Flaming arrows for B and LB.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Greg Regets]

Jon ...

With all due respect to my friend Chris, I find his question to be a
bit confusing.

In CamWar, Settlement Points may be used for Field Fortification on a
1/8 basis, which basically puts them on a Settlement Players list ...
right?

The question is simple ...

Since the Settlement player can buy Field Fortifications, does that
mean the other player can buy incendiaries?

Thanks ... g



--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 3/19/2004 3:55:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
christebo@s... writes:
>
> > In Campaign Warrior you are allowed to replace city militia troops
> > with Ditched Palacades on a point by point basis. >>
>
> 1/8 of settlement AP. Not exactly the same as what you said.
>
> >
> > Under 17.0 you are allowed to purchase incendiaries if your
enemy's
> > list provides for temporary fortifications or fighting transport.
Very
> > clear in a normal or tournament game; no so clear in a Campaign
> > Warrior situation.
> >
> > Do we take the 17.0 as worded and not allow invaders incendiary
> > weapons unless the defender has temporary fortifications or
> > fighting
> > transports specified on their list? >>
>
> Correct, for flaming arrows for B and LB. And this has nothing to
do with being the 'invader', btw, which isn't a CamWar term.

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 3/20/2004 05:54:55 Central Standard Time,
Harlan.D.Garrett@... writes:
Jon,

I am getting a little confused. It seems to me these two emails contradict
each other, please advise.

Harlan
here's the answer, Harlan:

"Since the Settlement player can buy Field Fortifications, does that
mean the other player can buy incendiaries?>>

Yes. Flaming arrows for B and LB."

If something about that seems incorrect AFTER playing some games with it,
then let me know.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Harlan Garrett]

Jon,

I am getting a little confused. It seems to me these two emails contradict
each other, please advise.

Harlan

**********FIRST EMAIL**********
-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 10:48 PM
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Re: Campaign Question - Incendiaries


In a message dated 3/19/2004 22:46:25 Central Standard Time,
greg.regets@... writes:
Since the Settlement player can buy Field Fortifications, does that
mean the other player can buy incendiaries?>>

Yes. Flaming arrows for B and LB.

**********SECOND EMAIL**********
-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Friday, March 19, 2004 3:02 PM
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Campaign Question - Incendiaries


In a message dated 3/19/2004 3:55:46 PM Eastern Standard Time,
christebo@... writes:

> In Campaign Warrior you are allowed to replace city militia troops
> with Ditched Palacades on a point by point basis. >>

1/8 of settlement AP. Not exactly the same as what you said.

>
> Under 17.0 you are allowed to purchase incendiaries if your enemy's
> list provides for temporary fortifications or fighting transport. Very
> clear in a normal or tournament game; no so clear in a Campaign
> Warrior situation.
>
> Do we take the 17.0 as worded and not allow invaders incendiary
> weapons unless the defender has temporary fortifications or fighting
> transports specified on their list? >>

Correct, for flaming arrows for B and LB. And this has nothing to do with
being the 'invader', btw, which isn't a CamWar term.

[Harlan Garrett]

Great, thanks!

Harlan

-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2004 8:51 AM
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Re: Campaign Question - Incendiaries


In a message dated 3/20/2004 05:54:55 Central Standard Time,
Harlan.D.Garrett@... writes:
Jon,

I am getting a little confused. It seems to me these two emails contradict
each other, please advise.

Harlan
here's the answer, Harlan:

"Since the Settlement player can buy Field Fortifications, does that
mean the other player can buy incendiaries?>>

Yes. Flaming arrows for B and LB."

If something about that seems incorrect AFTER playing some games with it,
then let me know.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links