Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 10/17/2005 20:55:59 Central Standard Time,
redcoat24@... writes:

Never mind Jon, I found the rule on page 31. Thanks anyway.

Allan





my favorite kind of rules question!

lol

Jon


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Hello Jon,

I was reading 5.52 and noticed in the wording that LHI LMI and LI waver test
when responding to a charge by mounted. If an Irreg A LMI unit is 120 paces from
mounted and they both charge each other impetuously, is the Irreg A unit
required to make a response, thus causing a waver test? Is it always assumed
that there is a response of some kind even though the LMI charge was not
cancelled and continued normally? Or is the LMI unit immune from a waver test in
this case?

I haven't written in a while so I hope thing are going well for you lately.

Thanks

Allan

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Never mind Jon, I found the rule on page 31. Thanks anyway.

Allan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Allan Lougheed" <redcoat24@...>
To: <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, October 17, 2005 6:31 PM
Subject: [WarriorRules] Charged by mounted question


> Hello Jon,
>
> I was reading 5.52 and noticed in the wording that LHI LMI and LI waver
> test when responding to a charge by mounted. If an Irreg A LMI unit is 120
> paces from mounted and they both charge each other impetuously, is the
> Irreg A unit required to make a response, thus causing a waver test? Is it
> always assumed that there is a response of some kind even though the LMI
> charge was not cancelled and continued normally? Or is the LMI unit immune
> from a waver test in this case?
>
> I haven't written in a while so I hope thing are going well for you
> lately.
>
> Thanks
>
> Allan
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>