Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Chris Bump]

Guys,

The detachment is a command issue, not a unit issue. The unit takes fatigue
as it would even if it were not a detachment and the parent body does the
same. Keep fatigue seperate between parent unit and detachment. The only
exception to this would be if the two were joined and the whole body then
took fatigue/ CPF's. Without doing the math, but assuming all the laws of
conservation, casualties per figure would be handed out per figure.

Chris

[Patrick Byrne]

More questions:

How does a detachment joined with a parent body take fatigue? Let's say
an IRR LMI parent unit in 2x2 with a 1x2 IRR LMI detachment forming the
rear rank takes 30 casualties. Is the casualty adjudication to take the
body as a whole divided into the casuaties and apply to both units? (ie
15men into 30 casualties is 2CPF, which does 4 fatigue to both parent
and detachment unit)?

I have the same question regarding General joining to fight. example:
SubGen element EHC L,B,Sh joins a 2 element unit of HC L, B, SH. They
now form a 1x3 body, charge into combat, and take 20 casualties. Is the
correct adjudication: 8 men into 20 casualties = 2 CPF, which is applied
to both the SubGen and the Cav Unit?

I ask because I am looking under 5.3 fatigue and 10.3 and am not seeing
the answer. I am reading some sentences which seem to skirt the issue.
I recommend adding a sentence like, "Casualties inflicted on two (or
more) units combined into one body are adjudicated by dividing the total
number of figure equivalents of the one body into the casualties. The
CPF's received and are then applied to each unit separetly."
-PB

[Don Coon]

> How does a detachment joined with a parent body take fatigue? Let's say
> an IRR LMI parent unit in 2x2 with a

>1x2 IRR LMI

Should this be 2X1?

>detachment forming the
> rear rank takes 30 casualties. Is the casualty adjudication to take the
> body as a whole divided into the casuaties and apply to both units? (ie
> 15men into 30 casualties is 2CPF, which does 4 fatigue to both parent
> and detachment unit)?

I think so.

[Patrick Byrne]

Thanks Chris, but I was hoping some-one could send me to rule (x.xx) because I
am not seeing how the rules state the way for 2 units joined together to take
fatigue. This was not just a detachment thing, it also included time when a
general joins a body to fight.

To better put my question...
Consider a person who just bought Warrior off the shelf at the local game
store. When he fights his buddy across the table with a detachment joined to a
parent body or a general joined to fight a body, what rule does he go to to
figure out how to ajudicate the casualties inflicted upon that body.
-PB

cncbump@... wrote:

> Guys,
>
> The detachment is a command issue, not a unit issue. The unit takes fatigue
> as it would even if it were not a detachment and the parent body does the
> same. Keep fatigue seperate between parent unit and detachment. The only
> exception to this would be if the two were joined and the whole body then
> took fatigue/ CPF's. Without doing the math, but assuming all the laws of
> conservation, casualties per figure would be handed out per figure.
>
> Chris
>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/