Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Jon

A rules question for a little change of pace :)

I'm a little unclear about the transition between a body being eager,
a body being eager, and back again.

I think a couple of examples are the best way to describe my
confusion.

1. A body of Irr C infantry is eager due their general w/army
standard advancing on bound 1.

On bound 2 his opponent moves first, and during cavalry moves moves a
unit of chariots close enough to be a cause of unease. As the
general has not had a chance to advance yet, do they become uneasy?

If so, do they become eager again if the general advances during
cavalry or staff moves.

If not, do they when do they become uneasy? At the end of the bound
if the general has not moved during approach/staff moves? At the end
of the approach movement phase? Some other time?

2. A body of Irr C infantry is eager due their general w/army
standard advancing on bound 1.

On bound 2 suffer from two causes of unease, enemy behind flank and
elephants say, and become uneasy.

After combat on bound 2 the enemy behind flank flee, removing a cause
of unease. During staff moves their general with standard advances
40 paces towards the oliphants.

Do the infantry become eager again at this point (because of the
general advancing, which would make them eager, or does the remaining
cause of unease prevent this?

3. A body of Irr B knights is dismounted as IrrC, and are not eager.
. During approaches the have a cause of unease, and become uneasy.

Also during approaches, they remount, and become IrrB again. This
should make them eager, except they have a cause of unease. Do they
remain uneasy, or does the IrrB mean they would now need 2 causes of
unease to be uneasy?

Writing this out makes me think that I've missed where it states how
to transition back out of unease...

Thanks
Cole


,

[joncleaves]

To use Ewan-speak (and I am attempting humor here, nothing more intended...)
unease is discrete, not continuous.

This means that since the effects of unease only matter in two cases - when one
takes a waver test and when one is declaring charges - you only ever check for
unease at the instant it matters. It has no real effect on game play if a body
actually had more than one state at different points in the bound.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Cioran <ncioran@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thu, 14 Apr 2005 18:08:39 -0000
Subject: [WarriorRules] Eager and Uneasy Question




Jon

A rules question for a little change of pace :)

I'm a little unclear about the transition between a body being eager,
a body being eager, and back again.

I think a couple of examples are the best way to describe my
confusion.

1. A body of Irr C infantry is eager due their general w/army
standard advancing on bound 1.

On bound 2 his opponent moves first, and during cavalry moves moves a
unit of chariots close enough to be a cause of unease. As the
general has not had a chance to advance yet, do they become uneasy?

If so, do they become eager again if the general advances during
cavalry or staff moves.

If not, do they when do they become uneasy? At the end of the bound
if the general has not moved during approach/staff moves? At the end
of the approach movement phase? Some other time?

2. A body of Irr C infantry is eager due their general w/army
standard advancing on bound 1.

On bound 2 suffer from two causes of unease, enemy behind flank and
elephants say, and become uneasy.

After combat on bound 2 the enemy behind flank flee, removing a cause
of unease. During staff moves their general with standard advances
40 paces towards the oliphants.

Do the infantry become eager again at this point (because of the
general advancing, which would make them eager, or does the remaining
cause of unease prevent this?

3. A body of Irr B knights is dismounted as IrrC, and are not eager.
. During approaches the have a cause of unease, and become uneasy.

Also during approaches, they remount, and become IrrB again. This
should make them eager, except they have a cause of unease. Do they
remain uneasy, or does the IrrB mean they would now need 2 causes of
unease to be uneasy?

Writing this out makes me think that I've missed where it states how
to transition back out of unease...

Thanks
Cole


,






Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]