 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Greg Regets Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 12:17 pm Post subject: Evade vs. Rally Back |
 |
|
Disclaimer #1 - The author means to say EXACTLY what he types here, with each
word of this post, both as mutually exclusive units, and as a collection of
thoughts. Please DO NOT substitute the terms, 40mm, 80mm, one element or two
elements, for any of the words expressed below - as this will get me the Vulcan
Death Grip from Jon (although I'm told I'm much bigger and meaner than Jon).
~wink~
Disclaimer #2 - In NO WAY is this post critical or meaning to slam Warrior or
anyone playing Warrior. It is just a @#$%ing question, with no motivation,
other than what is actually stated!
That said ...
I was wondering what the reasoning was behind allowing an evade move the
latitude to deviate, etc ... but a rally back must be directly to the rear?
I do not per-say disagree with it, I just wonder why it is, how it is. I have
heard the thought expressed that it gives the amscray a good bit of
flexibility, but does not give the organized reformation the same benefit.
Just curious ...
G
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Greg Regets Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 1:34 pm Post subject: Re: Evade vs. Rally Back |
 |
|
That makes good sense Jon. Thanks!!!
As it is a 'specific place' perhaps you could allow a unit to return to its
original position, plus or minus the roll. This would clean the result of
recall when you wheel or conform in your charge.
Just a thought ...
G
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 2:02 pm Post subject: Re: Evade vs. Rally Back |
 |
|
In a message dated 7/3/2003 09:19:23 Central Daylight Time, gar@...
writes:
> I was wondering what the reasoning was behind allowing an evade move the
> latitude to deviate, etc ... but a rally back must be directly to the rear?
>
Since you meant 'exactly' what you said above, I cannot answer your question,
since there is no 'rally back move' in Warrior. ~wink~ ~wink~ ~wink~
Let's assume you meant recall. Recalls are moves that reflect a return,
called for by the local unit commander on his initiative, by an exposed unit to
its original position or at least a position of less exposure roughly where the
battleline had been. In most but not all instances this would have to include
a gathering of the troops back into an ordered formation. Since it isn't all
instances, Warrior separates recall from rally where 7th does not.
Therefore, there is a specific 'place' the recalling unit is returning to.
In an evade move the body of troops is just trying to avoid contact. It can
do this by going 'back' to where it was (directly to the rear) or as far from
the charge as possible (directly away from the charge). Often these locations
are one in the same.
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|