Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Feudal Warrior Questions

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message

Recruit
Recruit


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 8

PostPosted: Mon Aug 04, 2003 3:10 pm    Post subject: Feudal Warrior Questions


Greetings!

I have a few questions about the new Feudal Warrior lists. Great
book, by the way.

The Burgundian Ordonnance list, No. 40, allows for an Italian Sub-
General who becomes mandatory if any Italian/Savoyard troops are
taken.

1. Since the Italian is a sub and not an ally general, can he
command troops other than the Italian/Savoyards?

2. Since he is a sub and not an ally, must he command all of the
Italian/Savoyard troops? Or can other generals command
Italian/Savoyard troops also?



The next question is more of a complaint. In the 100 Years War
English list, No. 30, is it really your intention to make the minimum
for Household men-at-arms to be 2 if the CinC is the King or Prince
of Wales? Given that it is standard play to have one element with
the CinC, that, for practical purposes, makes the minimum 3. I
noticed that some lists recognize this problem and make the minimum
number of elements 1 for troops that would generally be in a two
element body with a general.

An additional question along these lines is what if the CinC is the
king and one of the sub-generals is the Prince of Wales (Crecy)?
Should the upgrade to Reg. A be available for one of the sub-generals
also. This would also neatly take care of the problem of the minimum
number of Household men-at-arms.

I only raise these points as it is fun to have the King be the CinC
but the list as it now stands will certainly almost require one to
run the army without the King. I am certainly willing to do so, I
have always liked the Duke of Bedford, but the option to run Henry V
would be nice.

Thanks.

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group