Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Greg Regets · Imperator Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988

You are right Jon ... and yes, I'm having a bad week ... er ... month.

You have to expand your back element out in order to fit, which you can do
under the 6.0 thoughts on what to do if you get inside of the 40p approach
restriction.

I hate message boards ... ~wink~ ... it is so much easier to show on a table.

> <html><body>
>
>
> <tt>
> Greg sent me an explanatory diagram offline (I wish he had posted it instead
and I will
ask him to once I show him the issue with it). 
> 
> His concept - the idea of losing a fight with one 'shoulder' to expose its
flank to a cav
charge is a very valid one. 
> 
> The sole issue is that a 2E Cav unit is 96p deep in 15mm and cannot (CANNOT!)
physically
fit in a space between two units (friendly or enemy or both) that is 80p
across.
This is about fitting in a space and NOT about the 6.53 gap rule. 
> 
> Once I have made this clear, we'll get that diagram or one like it with the
correct
distances and to scale up on the group for all to see. 
> 
> Jon 
> </tt>
>
> 
>
> 
>
> <table border=0 cellspacing=0 cellpadding=2>
> <tr bgcolor=#FFFFCC>
> <td align=center>Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor</td>
> </tr>
> <tr bgcolor=#FFFFFF>
> <td align=center width=470><a
href="http://rd.yahoo.com/M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705059
080:HM/A=1564416/R=0/SIG=11ti81skc/*http://www.netflix.com/Default?
mqso=60164797&partid=3170658"><img
src="http://us.a1.yimg.com/us.yimg.com/a/ne/netflix/yhoo0303_b_300250a.gif"
alt=""
width="300" height="250" border="0"></a></td>
> </tr>
> <tr><td><img alt="" width=1 height=1
src="http://us.adserver.yahoo.com/l?
M=251812.3170658.4537139.1261774/D=egroupmail/S=:HM/A=1564416/rand=573554077"></
td></tr>

> </table>
>
> 
>
>
> 
> <tt>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: 
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com 
> 
> </tt>
> 
>
> 
> <tt>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the <a
href="http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/">Yahoo! Terms of Service</a>.</tt>
> 
>
> </body></html>
>

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

Greg sent me an explanatory diagram offline (I wish he had posted it instead and
I will ask him to once I show him the issue with it).

His concept - the idea of losing a fight with one 'shoulder' to expose its flank
to a cav charge is a very valid one.

The sole issue is that a 2E Cav unit is 96p deep in 15mm and cannot (CANNOT!)
physically fit in a space between two units (friendly or enemy or both) that is
80p across. This is about fitting in a space and NOT about the 6.53 gap rule.

Once I have made this clear, we'll get that diagram or one like it with the
correct distances and to scale up on the group for all to see.

Jon

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

In a message dated 7/1/2003 11:20:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, gar@...
writes:

> I hate message boards ... ~wink~ ... it is so much easier
> to show on a table.>>

Amen, brother.