 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 4:38 am Post subject: Re: Greg''s LC Flank Charge GAP TACTIC |
 |
|
In a message dated 7/2/2003 22:35:39 Central Daylight Time,
rockd@... writes:
> Oh !!!!! You mean a 2E Cav unit WHICH IS IN COLUMN cannot fit on a
> flank IF THAT FLANK IS IN A GAP ONLY 80p WIDE.
>
Exactly.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Doug Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1412
|
Posted: Thu Jul 03, 2003 7:34 am Post subject: Re: Greg''s LC Flank Charge GAP TACTIC |
 |
|
>Greg sent me an explanatory diagram offline (I wish he had posted it
>instead and I will ask him to once I show him the issue with it).
>
>His concept - the idea of losing a fight with one 'shoulder' to
>expose its flank to a cav charge is a very valid one.
>
>The sole issue is that a 2E Cav unit is 96p deep in 15mm and cannot
>(CANNOT!) physically fit in a space between two units (friendly or
>enemy or both) that is 80p across. This is about fitting in a space
>and NOT about the 6.53 gap rule.
Oh !!!!! You mean a 2E Cav unit WHICH IS IN COLUMN cannot fit on a
flank IF THAT FLANK IS IN A GAP ONLY 80p WIDE.
And here I was thinking that my 15mm troops must be based wrong...
And its really not helping that this issue is now being discussed
under at least three different SUBJECT lines.
>
>Once I have made this clear, we'll get that diagram or one like it
>with the correct distances and to scale up on the group for all to
>see.
>
>Jon
--
Doug
The price of freedom is infernal vigilantes
Mr RHEA, of Tennessee, said...he believed it a correct principle that
all the militia should be armed under a Republican government. One
of the objects of such a Government was, that the people should have
arms in their hands; and those who legislate for them should take
every possible means to effect that object. For the want of arms
being in the hands of the people of the nations of Europe, their
liberty was lost. (Dec 1807)
U.S. Congressional Documents and Debates, 1774 - 1873
Annals of Congress, House of Representatives, 10th Congress, 1st Session
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains
information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under
applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail,
in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender
by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system. Unless
explicitly and conspicuously designated as "E-Contract Intended",
this e-mail does not constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment,
or an acceptance of a contract offer. This e-mail does not constitute
a consent to the use of sender's contact information for direct marketing
purposes or for transfers of data to third parties.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|