 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:24 pm Post subject: IW Patrician LIST errata? |
 |
|
Took a closer look at the new Patsies this morning. Thinking about
how to run them when I get back from school.
Seems the Germanic Foederati Cavalry are to some degree intended for
mixed units of Nobles / Followers. Ostrogoths and a whole bunch of
other beasties of this type in the new book all have this capability,
but in the Patrician list notes only Romans are mentioned for mixed
units. And in fact the satement that non-general units may not mix
morale grades in the Patrician list would disallow this. Are these
oversights mainly intended for the "Roman" elements of this list?
This is looking interesting, my first real trash-troop Warrior army.
If I didn't need general elements I could actually field every other
figure I have for these guys at under 1600 pts! Even with a couple
little neat upgrades! Cool! Can't wait.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2004 11:32 pm Post subject: Re: IW Patrician LIST errata? |
 |
|
Replying to my own message, maybe a sign senility has finally set in
after all...
The mixed morale restriction also hoses the Germ Foed Warriors who
can't use their upgrade to B class as a result. This is looking more
like an oversight, maybe?
I will await an answer whenever you get a chance Scott. I know
sometimes these things can take a bit while you consult with the list
contributors and your notes etcetera. I don't really need to know for
a couple months anyway.
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "J. Murphy" <jjmurphy@s...>
wrote:
> Took a closer look at the new Patsies this morning. Thinking about
> how to run them when I get back from school.
>
> Seems the Germanic Foederati Cavalry are to some degree intended
for
> mixed units of Nobles / Followers. Ostrogoths and a whole bunch of
> other beasties of this type in the new book all have this
capability,
> but in the Patrician list notes only Romans are mentioned for mixed
> units. And in fact the satement that non-general units may not mix
> morale grades in the Patrician list would disallow this. Are these
> oversights mainly intended for the "Roman" elements of this list?
>
> This is looking interesting, my first real trash-troop Warrior
army.
> If I didn't need general elements I could actually field every
other
> figure I have for these guys at under 1600 pts! Even with a couple
> little neat upgrades! Cool! Can't wait.
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Sat Mar 20, 2004 12:30 am Post subject: Re: IW Patrician LIST errata? |
 |
|
Of course (duh, what am I thinking) you can have an entirely seperate
unit of B class Foot Warriors, but not sure that is the way the list
was intended, looks more like the typical Irr eager-but-brittle
warband mentality like you see in the other similar lists.
Either way still want to know about the mounted Foederati noble /
follower mixing, in violation of the Patrician non-mixed-morale rule
as well as not called out in the notes. This is the one more likely
to see use by me if allowed anyway. I am thinking "god awful cheap
lancers" here!
> The mixed morale restriction also hoses the Germ Foed Warriors who
> can't use their upgrade to B class as a result. This is looking
more
> like an oversight, maybe?
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|