Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Jon,

I was just musing over an army list and had an interesting
thought. Say one is playing in a tournament, we'll say historicon
for instance, and you get creamed 5-0 in the game. After the game
you find out your opponent's list was over by 1 or more points.
Question: Does the fact that your opponent was over his points
minimum give you a point making the round a 5-1 instead of a 5-0?

Kelly

[Mike Turner]

Kelly, Jon probably won't answer this question as it is a tournament
question and Scott handles NASAMW "stuff", Jon sticks to
Warrior "stuff".

So, I'd ask Scott if you want an answer,
Mike


--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "jwilkinson62"
<jwilkinson62@y...> wrote:
>
> Jon,
>
> I was just musing over an army list and had an interesting
> thought. Say one is playing in a tournament, we'll say historicon
> for instance, and you get creamed 5-0 in the game. After the game
> you find out your opponent's list was over by 1 or more points.
> Question: Does the fact that your opponent was over his points
> minimum give you a point making the round a 5-1 instead of a 5-0?
>
> Kelly

[joncleaves]

Mike's right - can't answer this one, it's a NASAMW issue, not an FHE one and I
have learned that my original policy of keeping those entirely separate is
really best.

What would I do in a local event? If it were, in my opinion, an honest mistake,
I'd let it go. If I thought it was cheating, I'd boot him and probably adjust
his opponent's score, but that last would be highly situational.

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Thanks Jon,

I really didn't mean to say the player that was over by one point would be
cheating. What I mean to say is that the player that is over is legally over 1
or within the cheapest element over. Would that consitute his opponent getting
at least 1 point even if he killed nothing - - in tournaments that you would
hypothetically run?

kw


JonCleaves@... wrote:
Mike's right - can't answer this one, it's a NASAMW issue, not an FHE one and I
have learned that my original policy of keeping those entirely separate is
really best.

What would I do in a local event? If it were, in my opinion, an honest mistake,
I'd let it go. If I thought it was cheating, I'd boot him and probably adjust
his opponent's score, but that last would be highly situational.

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
document.write('');

---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Search presents - Jib Jab's 'Second Term'

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Charles Yaw]

Jon,

A list writing question. Lists are allowed to be over by less than
the cost of the cheapest unit in the list.

If a list has a line for Irr C LI @ 4 points per stand and that LI is
downgradable to Irr D LI @ 2 points per stand, which is the list cost
limit, the Irr C @ 4 points (the standard list entry) or the
downgrade Irr D LI @ 2 points?

Thanks, Charles

[joncleaves]

If a list has a line for Irr C LI @ 4 points per stand and that LI is
downgradable to Irr D LI @ 2 points per stand, which is the list cost
limit, the Irr C @ 4 points (the standard list entry) or the
downgrade Irr D LI @ 2 points?>>
[
Irr D at 2 points.