Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Afternoon guys,

Got a question about leaving the table and coming back on in regard
to Fast Warrior. In a recent game I pursued a broken unit off of
the table. When I went to roll to bring my unit back onto the table
I was told that in Fast Warrior that all troops leaving the table are
not allowed to come back on. Now I have a problem with this as the
rules clearly state the following:

6.823 - The following troops many not return to the table once they
have left it:

* Shaken Troops
* Broken Troops
* Exhausted Troops
* Troops on retreat, wait, hold or delay orders (4.5)
* Troops who left the table by evading, breaking-off, recall, recoil
or rout

Any unit eligible to return that leaves the table is treated as an
arrival (6.821). Returning troops enter with the center of the
body's front rank within 240p of where its center left the table.

Now giving the rules up above I believe that troops who Pursuit off
the table per 6.81 in Combat Results Moves can come back on the table.

I would like to get a full understanding of this as it should apply
to Fast Warrior as well as Warrior.

Second Question comes to mind. Troops who's evade take them to the
table edge and pass it. Can they turn 90 degrees to avoid going off
the table? Reason for this is that troops can not voluntarily leave
the table per 6.81 yet the rules also state evades must move directly
away from the chargers to their rear or directly from the chargers.
(6.166 page 44, in the middle). So I can only see the 90 degrees
turn in regard to being charge not from the front but at an angle to
the chargers front.

AGain, everyones thoughts are appreciated in this matter.

Jack Young
417-833-5112

[joncleaves]

<<> I was told that in Fast Warrior that all troops leaving the table are
> not allowed to come back on.>>

That is incorrect. Nothing in 18.0 changes anything in 6.8.

<< Second Question comes to mind. Troops who's evade take them to the
> table edge and pass it. Can they turn 90 degrees to avoid going off
> the table? >>

No.

Jon