Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Dave Smith]

Scott;

I need your help in understanding a couple of things on this list.
First, under Legionairies, it reads "up to half JLS, rest HTW, Sh"-
my question is are the JLS optional or must you take at least 1
element of Legionairies as equipped with JLS. Probably a goofy
question, but I interpreted it a couple of ways. Secondly, should
it not be optional to take the Roman bolt-shooters as an attachment
to a legionary unit. Most of the OB's that I'm familiar with
indicate that the bolt-shooters were intergral with the centuries in
a cohort/legion, and then at times brigaded together. Lastly, the
list allows boats, but I see no line item for cost. Maybe that is
my unfamiliarity with Warrior coming through, but what's their
purpose, and are they free? Thanks in advance for your help.

Good luck to all at Historicon. I expect to hear some great war
stories next week.

Dave

[scott holder]

I need your help in understanding a couple of things on this list.
First, under Legionairies, it reads "up to half JLS, rest HTW, Sh"-
my question is are the JLS optional or must you take at least 1
element of Legionairies as equipped with JLS.

>There is no requirement for any legionaries to have JLS.

Probably a goofy
question, but I interpreted it a couple of ways. Secondly, should
it not be optional to take the Roman bolt-shooters as an attachment
to a legionary unit. Most of the OB's that I'm familiar with
indicate that the bolt-shooters were intergral with the centuries in
a cohort/legion, and then at times brigaded together.

>I'll take this one under advisement and relook at down the line. In the
meantime, the bolt shooters are not detachments.

Lastly, the
list allows boats, but I see no line item for cost. Maybe that is
my unfamiliarity with Warrior coming through, but what's their
purpose, and are they free? Thanks in advance for your help.

>Boats are costed in 17.0 of the rules.

[Kelly Wilkinson]

Aren't you going, Dave?

kelly

David Smith <davidsmith@...> wrote:
Scott;

I need your help in understanding a couple of things on this list.
First, under Legionairies, it reads "up to half JLS, rest HTW, Sh"-
my question is are the JLS optional or must you take at least 1
element of Legionairies as equipped with JLS. Probably a goofy
question, but I interpreted it a couple of ways. Secondly, should
it not be optional to take the Roman bolt-shooters as an attachment
to a legionary unit. Most of the OB's that I'm familiar with
indicate that the bolt-shooters were intergral with the centuries in
a cohort/legion, and then at times brigaded together. Lastly, the
list allows boats, but I see no line item for cost. Maybe that is
my unfamiliarity with Warrior coming through, but what's their
purpose, and are they free? Thanks in advance for your help.

Good luck to all at Historicon. I expect to hear some great war
stories next week.

Dave


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Dave Smith]

Nope.....schedule is interfering. Give me a call when you get back
and we'll roll some bones.

Dave


--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, kelly wilkinson
<jwilkinson62@y...> wrote:
> Aren't you going, Dave?
>
> kelly
>
> David Smith <davidsmith@k...> wrote:
> Scott;
>
> I need your help in understanding a couple of things on this
list.
> First, under Legionairies, it reads "up to half JLS, rest HTW, Sh"-
> my question is are the JLS optional or must you take at least 1
> element of Legionairies as equipped with JLS. Probably a goofy
> question, but I interpreted it a couple of ways. Secondly, should
> it not be optional to take the Roman bolt-shooters as an
attachment
> to a legionary unit. Most of the OB's that I'm familiar with
> indicate that the bolt-shooters were intergral with the centuries
in
> a cohort/legion, and then at times brigaded together. Lastly, the
> list allows boats, but I see no line item for cost. Maybe that is
> my unfamiliarity with Warrior coming through, but what's their
> purpose, and are they free? Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Good luck to all at Historicon. I expect to hear some great war
> stories next week.
>
> Dave
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Kelly Wilkinson]

sounds good,
btw, do you need any unpainted 25mm EIR?

KP

David Smith <davidsmith@...> wrote:
Nope.....schedule is interfering. Give me a call when you get back
and we'll roll some bones.

Dave


--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, kelly wilkinson
<jwilkinson62@y...> wrote:
> Aren't you going, Dave?
>
> kelly
>
> David Smith <davidsmith@k...> wrote:
> Scott;
>
> I need your help in understanding a couple of things on this
list.
> First, under Legionairies, it reads "up to half JLS, rest HTW, Sh"-
> my question is are the JLS optional or must you take at least 1
> element of Legionairies as equipped with JLS. Probably a goofy
> question, but I interpreted it a couple of ways. Secondly, should
> it not be optional to take the Roman bolt-shooters as an
attachment
> to a legionary unit. Most of the OB's that I'm familiar with
> indicate that the bolt-shooters were intergral with the centuries
in
> a cohort/legion, and then at times brigaded together. Lastly, the
> list allows boats, but I see no line item for cost. Maybe that is
> my unfamiliarity with Warrior coming through, but what's their
> purpose, and are they free? Thanks in advance for your help.
>
> Good luck to all at Historicon. I expect to hear some great war
> stories next week.
>
> Dave
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service.
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]


Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT


---------------------------------
Yahoo! Groups Links

To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.



---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Vote for the stars of Yahoo!'s next ad campaign!

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Dave Smith]

Scott, et.al.;

The clarification states that. " A HI Roman General element is
considered a 'legionary' for all special purposes and rules."
However, since the only option for a Roman general on this list is HC,
does that mean if the general dismounts as HC, that this is when this
kicks in? Or, is there an option I'm not seeing, that allows you to
field a general as HI, HTW, Sh? Thanks in advance.


Dave

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 7/17/2005 14:04:28 Central Daylight Time,
davidsmith@... writes:

Scott, et.al.;

The clarification states that. " A HI Roman General element is
considered a 'legionary' for all special purposes and rules."
However, since the only option for a Roman general on this list is HC,
does that mean if the general dismounts as HC, that this is when this
kicks in? Or, is there an option I'm not seeing, that allows you to
field a general as HI, HTW, Sh? Thanks in advance.


Dave >>


That's for when he dismounts, Dave.

Jon









[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 7/17/2005 20:57:19 Central Daylight Time,
davidsmith@... writes:

Thanks, Jon. But then do you need to have another HC element
dismount, in order to gain the 1 stand of HI? That would make
sense, but just want to be sure.>>


Yes, the dismount rules say no part elements.

This often done by 2E HC JLS generals who dismount and then give a reg A
element to the front rank of a foot body by joining it.

Jon








[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[Dave Smith]

Thanks, Jon. But then do you need to have another HC element
dismount, in order to gain the 1 stand of HI? That would make
sense, but just want to be sure.

Dave






--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>
> In a message dated 7/17/2005 14:04:28 Central Daylight Time,
> davidsmith@k... writes:
>
> Scott, et.al.;
>
> The clarification states that. " A HI Roman General element is
> considered a 'legionary' for all special purposes and rules."
> However, since the only option for a Roman general on this list
is HC,
> does that mean if the general dismounts as HC, that this is when
this
> kicks in? Or, is there an option I'm not seeing, that allows you
to
> field a general as HI, HTW, Sh? Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Dave >>
>
>
> That's for when he dismounts, Dave.
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]