 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 156
|
Posted: Thu Feb 16, 2006 7:19 pm Post subject: New Roman List Rule Question |
 |
|
With regards to the rear rank counting as steady rule even if the body
is disordered.
Out of curioisity, does this apply if the body is disordered due to
being in disordering terrain? Unlike disorder caused by shooting or
combat, this would seem to effect all of the sub units within the
body...
I ask because this very situation came up in a recent game I played
against the Romans (before the list rule revisions).
Thanks
Cole
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Low Moderator

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 329
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 6:33 pm Post subject: Re: New Roman List Rule Question |
 |
|
Good point, Cole. It shouldn't. We've taken a careful look at this
question, not only as to terrain but other causes of disorder as
well. We will be posting a fix shortly.
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "Nicholas Cioran" <ncioran@...>
wrote:
>
> With regards to the rear rank counting as steady rule even if the
body
> is disordered.
>
> Out of curioisity, does this apply if the body is disordered due to
> being in disordering terrain? Unlike disorder caused by shooting
or
> combat, this would seem to effect all of the sub units within the
> body...
>
> I ask because this very situation came up in a recent game I played
> against the Romans (before the list rule revisions).
>
> Thanks
> Cole
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 14
|
Posted: Wed Mar 08, 2006 9:36 pm Post subject: New Roman List Rule Question |
 |
|
According to the list rule for Roman Legionaries.
"2) Replace an element in contact with opponents with an element
directly to its rear during the Approach or Counter/Retirment phase
(as well as when making a Recoil move, 6.51), without dicing or being
prompted, but only during the second bound of a continuing H-T-H
combat. Such a replacing element counts as steady in the following
H-T-H combat phase, even if its body is not otherwise considered
steady; thereafter, it counts as having the cohesion of the worst
affected element(s) in the body. Such a replacing element also counts
as in first contact (9.3), even though its body is by definition
already in contact; it does not count as charging or counter-charging
(9.42)."
They count steady even when the whole unit is disordered?
Does that mean that mounted facing them lose the +2 hand to hand
tactical factor for fighting against disordered foot?
Does this mean that an opposing unit with a two handed weapon such as
a 2HCW count as shielded since it counts as "first contact (9.3)" ?
And also can a JLS armed unit with another weapon also get the JLS+
bonus since it counts as "first contact (9.3)" also?
Just curious about how close Roman Legionaries are getting to become
Supermen.
John Steil
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Bill Low Moderator

Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 329
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 12:37 am Post subject: Re: New Roman List Rule Question |
 |
|
It is important to distinguish between the way in which the replacing
Roman element is treated (i.e., counts as in first contact) and the
way in which its opponents are treated (which is no different absent
the Circulating Combatants rule). The answers to your questions then
would be:
Yes - counts as steady, even if the unit is disordered
Yes - mounted lose the +2 for facing a disordered foot unit
No - opposing units are treated as they "normally" would be
No – ditto
Thanks.
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "seventhidsoldier"
<john_steil@...> wrote:
>
> According to the list rule for Roman Legionaries.
>
> "2) Replace an element in contact with opponents with an element
> directly to its rear during the Approach or Counter/Retirment phase
> (as well as when making a Recoil move, 6.51), without dicing or
being
> prompted, but only during the second bound of a continuing H-T-H
> combat. Such a replacing element counts as steady in the following
> H-T-H combat phase, even if its body is not otherwise considered
> steady; thereafter, it counts as having the cohesion of the worst
> affected element(s) in the body. Such a replacing element also
counts
> as in first contact (9.3), even though its body is by definition
> already in contact; it does not count as charging or counter-
charging
> (9.42)."
>
> They count steady even when the whole unit is disordered?
>
> Does that mean that mounted facing them lose the +2 hand to hand
> tactical factor for fighting against disordered foot?
>
> Does this mean that an opposing unit with a two handed weapon such
as
> a 2HCW count as shielded since it counts as "first contact (9.3)" ?
>
> And also can a JLS armed unit with another weapon also get the JLS+
> bonus since it counts as "first contact (9.3)" also?
>
>
> Just curious about how close Roman Legionaries are getting to become
> Supermen.
>
> John Steil
>
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
John Murphy Legate

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1625
|
Posted: Fri Mar 10, 2006 3:00 am Post subject: Re: New Roman List Rule Question |
 |
|
Does "steady in the HtH combat phase" include, in addition to HtH
casualty calculation...
Steady against enemy support shooting, and for any waver tests
caused by enemy support shooting?
Steady for determining wether combat result waver tests are required?
Steady for purposes of combat result moves, including possible waver
testing if broken through etc?
Is "HtH combat" as a "phase" actually defined in those terms in the
rules anywhere?
> --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "seventhidsoldier"
> <john_steil@> wrote:
> >
> > According to the list rule for Roman Legionaries.
> >
> > "2) Replace an element in contact with opponents with an element
> > directly to its rear during the Approach or Counter/Retirment
phase
> > (as well as when making a Recoil move, 6.51), without dicing or
> being
> > prompted, but only during the second bound of a continuing H-T-H
> > combat. Such a replacing element counts as steady in the
following
> > H-T-H combat phase, even if its body is not otherwise considered
> > steady; thereafter, it counts as having the cohesion of the worst
> > affected element(s) in the body. Such a replacing element also
> counts
> > as in first contact (9.3), even though its body is by definition
> > already in contact; it does not count as charging or counter-
> charging
> > (9.42)."
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|