Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

In a game this weekend I ended up with unreliable general who rolled a one
and thus had his orders changed to "wait". I have two main questions. The C&C
became aware that the sub was not following his orders on bound one since I had
force marched an LI unit to the middle of the table and I was unable to then
move past the middle of the table. Under 4.43 (last paragraph) "he (the C&C) may
issue new oders on the SECOND subsequent bound". Thus I could issue new orders
to the sub during the orders phase of bound three....correct?
On bound three the general sends new orders to the Sub. For the sake of
argument let's say it takes 8 minutes. When is the sub allowed to relay the
orders...on bound three or bound 4? Under 4.42 it says "...subordinate or ally
general that recieved an order change does not subtract the amount of 'time' it
took to receive the order from the C&C". This seems to imply that the order
could be relayed by the Sub on bound three, but it is not clear to me. Thanks!


Paul Wilson

P.S. I forgot to mention that all of this was a moot point in this particular
game. My general sent the new orders and the sub misinterpreted them
again....and stayed on wait ;)





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

[joncleaves]

a) Bound three, correct.

b) A sub or ally retransmits an order received from the CINC on the same bound.
The sub/ally's minutes are brand new minutes and have nothing to do with how
many the CINC spent getting the order to them.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wilson <pwilson@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:59:56 -0500
Subject: [WarriorRules] Order communication question


In a game this weekend I ended up with unreliable general who rolled a one
and thus had his orders changed to "wait". I have two main questions. The C&C
became aware that the sub was not following his orders on bound one since I had
force marched an LI unit to the middle of the table and I was unable to then
move past the middle of the table. Under 4.43 (last paragraph) "he (the C&C) may
issue new oders on the SECOND subsequent bound". Thus I could issue new orders
to the sub during the orders phase of bound three....correct?
On bound three the general sends new orders to the Sub. For the sake of
argument let's say it takes 8 minutes. When is the sub allowed to relay the
orders...on bound three or bound 4? Under 4.42 it says "...subordinate or ally
general that recieved an order change does not subtract the amount of 'time' it
took to receive the order from the C&C". This seems to imply that the order
could be relayed by the Sub on bound three, but it is not clear to me. Thanks!


Paul Wilson

P.S. I forgot to mention that all of this was a moot point in this particular
game. My general sent the new orders and the sub misinterpreted them
again....and stayed on wait ;)





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Thanks again Jon.



Paul

________________________________

From: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com [mailto:WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of JonCleaves@...
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 10:46 AM
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Order communication question



a) Bound three, correct.

b) A sub or ally retransmits an order received from the CINC on the same
bound. The sub/ally's minutes are brand new minutes and have nothing to
do with how many the CINC spent getting the order to them.

Jon

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Wilson <pwilson@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:59:56 -0500
Subject: [WarriorRules] Order communication question


In a game this weekend I ended up with unreliable general who
rolled a one
and thus had his orders changed to "wait". I have two main questions.
The C&C
became aware that the sub was not following his orders on bound one
since I had
force marched an LI unit to the middle of the table and I was unable to
then
move past the middle of the table. Under 4.43 (last paragraph) "he (the
C&C) may
issue new oders on the SECOND subsequent bound". Thus I could issue new
orders
to the sub during the orders phase of bound three....correct?
On bound three the general sends new orders to the Sub. For the
sake of
argument let's say it takes 8 minutes. When is the sub allowed to relay
the
orders...on bound three or bound 4? Under 4.42 it says "...subordinate
or ally
general that recieved an order change does not subtract the amount of
'time' it
took to receive the order from the C&C". This seems to imply that the
order
could be relayed by the Sub on bound three, but it is not clear to me.
Thanks!


Paul Wilson

P.S. I forgot to mention that all of this was a moot point in this
particular
game. My general sent the new orders and the sub misinterpreted them
again....and stayed on wait ;)





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




________________________________

YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



* Visit your group "WarriorRules
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules> " on the web.

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
<mailto:WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com?subject=Unsubscribe>

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
Service <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .



________________________________



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]