Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Tom McMillan]

Scott Holder wrote:

****OTOH, I feel it ends up being not unfair and makes some amount
of
sense. The way the lists are structured, you oftentimes simply
cannot put together the "perfect" list (for you) unless, for
example, the total in the list comes out to 1604 points (or whatever
small overage from the assigned limit).***8

So then why not play 1610 pt games?. Yes, i know, because then you
would need 1615 to make your perfect list balance out.
Speaking as an outsider, this just strikes me as a silly thing to be
making such a fuss about, as it has for the last 20 years.
I never understood where the '1 element over' came from, penalising
cheap armies. I suppose you could make it 'up to the single most
expensive element available in the game', and actually play 1648 pt
games or something to have a 1600 pt game. But the point stull escapes
me. Tom