Warrior Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules
A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
  FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups AlbumAlbum   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Pontic Question

 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Kelly Wilkinson
Dictator
Dictator


Joined: 12 Apr 2006
Posts: 4172
Location: Raytown, MO

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2004 3:18 am    Post subject: Pontic Question


Hi,

I was just thumbing through my,"The Armies and Enemies of
Imperial Rome", by Phil Barker, when I noticed that it mentions that
the imitation legionaires in the Pontic army were trained by Roman
Exiles. In turn it also mentions that the Armenians imitation
legionaires were trained by the Pontics. So, to my question. Do
should Pontic Imitation legionaires also be covered under the "Roman
Infantry rule just as the Armenians are?"

kelly
PS If anyone knows any history to this, would you mind sounding off,
please?


_________________
Roll down and Win!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Bill Low
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 02 Apr 2006
Posts: 329

PostPosted: Sun Mar 28, 2004 8:27 am    Post subject: Re: Pontic Question


Well, Kelly, we're getting better at this ... but we're not yet perfect.

There are no "Roman Legionaries" in the Early Armenian List 2. There are
"Imitation Legionaries" in List 2, but they are not the same thing, and
they are not entitled to the benefits of the Roman Infantry Rules. The
reference to List 2 in the Roman Infantry Rules will be deleted in the
errata. Sorry.

It took a little while to sink in, but eventually it seems the Eastern
powers concluded that the traditional pike phalanx could not stand up to
the Roman legions, and they started to train up and arm their own versions
of the legionary. Mithradates VI of Pontus and later Tigranes the Great of
Armenia were prominent examples of this tendency, but one could also cite
Commagene and the Galatians under their tetrach Deiotarus. It does appear
that representatives of the Populares, the losing side in the Roman civil
wars of the era, helped in this effort, but there were always Roman
deserters who could do the same thing and once the "secret" got out, it
could be spread by anyone in the know. (When Mithradates fled overland to
the Bosporus after his final defeat by Rome, one of the few organized units
that accompanied him was a body of Roman deserters, who would have been
trained and armed as legionaires and were no doubt available to help to
instruct the easterners.) Sertorius, who was then maintaining himself in
Spain in defiance of the government in Rome (and thus not exactly an
exile), sent military advisers to the East, at the time of his alliance
with Mithradates, who are supposed to have helped train elements of the
Pontic and possibly the Armenian armies. Tigranes was Mithradates'
son-in-law, and obtained a variety of military and political support from
Pontus in creating his short-lived empire, which could well have included
military advisers. There is no question but that these eastern Imitation
Legionaries never reached the level of professionalism, esprit and
technical proficiency of the true Roman Legionaries, and thus they can't
use any of the Roman Infantry Rules. (I am not speaking of the legio XXII
Deiotariana, formed from Galatian "legions," some of which had supported
Caesar against Pharnaces, which was later accepted into Roman service and
appears thereafter to have been indistinguishable from other "Roman" legions.)

You will note that there is a list rule in both List 2 (Armenian) and List
11 (Mithradatic), designed to reflect the limited training and capacity of
the Armenian Imitation Legionaries and the hastily-raised and partially
ex-slave portions of the Mithradatic phalanx. We hope you find it
interesting. We expect to make even greater efforts in future to add bits
like this to various armies, to illustrate their peculiarities but also
just to represent better the tremendous sweep of time and history
encompassed by the Warrior rules system.


At 12:18 AM 3/28/2004 +0000, jwilkinson62 wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "The Armies and Enemies of
>", by Phil Barker, when I noticed that it mentions that
> the imitation legionaires in the Pontic army were trained by Roman
> Exiles. In turn it also mentions that the Armenians imitation
> legionaires were trained by the Pontics. So, to my question. Do
>"Roman
>"
>
> kelly
> PS If anyone knows any history to this, would you mind sounding off,
> please?
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ADVERTISEMENT
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

-----------------------------------------------------
From Harold William Low

Back to top
View user's profile Send private message  
Display posts from previous:   
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules Forum Index -> Egroup Archives All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group