Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Don Coon]

> 4. Replace the section of 11.2 titled Who May (or Must) Pursue with:

> Non-impetuous troops must make one pursuit move (two if irregular). Further
pursuit is optional.
> There are two exceptions to this rule:
>  Foot troops standing to receive a mounted charge may not pursue.
>  Regular close formation foot or any regular foot troops who
originally stood to receive a foot charge (and have not since followed up) have
the option to pursue.

maybe add "are not required to but" before "have"

Don

[Don Coon]

JonCleaves@... wrote:

> 4. Replace the section of 11.2 titled Who May (or Must) Pursue with:
>
> Pursuit is a tactical move (6.33) made when all opponents break-off or rout.
Pursuit is a variable move (6.11).
>
> Impetuous troops must continue to make pursuit moves until required to cease
(see below).
>
> Non-impetuous troops must make one pursuit move (two if irregular). Further
pursuit is optional.
> There are two exceptions to this rule:
>  Foot troops standing to receive a mounted charge may not pursue.
>  Regular close formation foot or any regular foot troops who
originally stood to receive a foot charge (and have not since followed up) have
the option to pursue.
>
> Pursuit ceases if the pursuing body is outdistanced, or if all pursuit targets
are destroyed, or if the pursuit is converted into a charge (6.167).
>
> Jon

Now 6.34 needs "opponents pursue per 11.2" to replace "Opponents may
persue if eligible" as the start of the third sentance.

Don

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 8/31/00 19:38:50 Central Daylight Time, jendon@...
writes:

<< maybe add "are not required to but" before "have" >>

Consider it done.

Jon

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 8/31/00 20:07:42 Central Daylight Time, jendon@...
writes:

<< Now 6.34 needs "opponents pursue per 11.2" to replace "Opponents may
persue if eligible" as the start of the third sentance. >>

Okay.

Jon

[joncleaves]

Harlan, et al.

After some playtesting this weekend, I'll get out the full revised known and
pursuit paragraphs again.

Jon

[Harlan Garrett]

Hello All

OK, you may have already mention this, but where is this change being made.

Harlan

-----Original Message-----
From: JonCleaves@... [mailto:JonCleaves@...]
Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 2:05 AM
To: WarriorRules@egroups.com
Subject: Re: [WarriorRules] Pursuit



In a message dated 8/31/00 19:38:50 Central Daylight Time, jendon@...
writes:

<< maybe add "are not required to but" before "have" >>

Consider it done.

Jon

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com