Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Jon Cleaves wrote:
> Whoa, Cole, I didn't laugh off anything. Nor was I attacking any
particular piece of research by you or anyone else.
> I do feel there is way too much revision in today's history,
typically designed to separate the writer from perfectly acceptable
conclusions made in the past but that he needs to 'debunk' in order to
make a name for himself.

Damn, it seems like Yahoo ate the long response I just wrote to this,
and I'm out of time. For now, my apologies, as my previous post was
written too quickly while irritated by other matters. I should know
better.

However, when time allows expect a long post disagreeing with
your "perfectly acceptable" comments :)

Have fun!
Cole

[joncleaves]

Don't overdo it on my account....lol I am not being unfriendly when I say that
this isn't a discussion I plan to get into in depth - just not my thing to do
so. No offense, I'm just not into this type of exchange.

J

-----Original Message-----
From: Nicholas Cioran <ncioran@...>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, 01 Apr 2005 18:33:31 -0000
Subject: [WarriorRules] Revisionist History




Jon Cleaves wrote:
> Whoa, Cole, I didn't laugh off anything. Nor was I attacking any
particular piece of research by you or anyone else.
> I do feel there is way too much revision in today's history,
typically designed to separate the writer from perfectly acceptable
conclusions made in the past but that he needs to 'debunk' in order to
make a name for himself.

Damn, it seems like Yahoo ate the long response I just wrote to this,
and I'm out of time. For now, my apologies, as my previous post was
written too quickly while irritated by other matters. I should know
better.

However, when time allows expect a long post disagreeing with
your "perfectly acceptable" comments :)

Have fun!
Cole







Yahoo! Groups Links






[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]