 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 5:00 pm Post subject: Re: Romans in CW |
 |
|
There are indeed a couple of cases where a troop type in one book gets a
list rule and we may not have caught every appearance of the troop type in other
books, especially those that came earlier. We'll review and fix where
necessary and appropriate.
Jon
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Recruit

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 18
|
Posted: Sat Apr 23, 2005 8:53 pm Post subject: Romans in CW |
 |
|
Hello, I suppose this point needs to be brought up to the list
person. After perusing a copy of Classical Warrior and being a
staunch Roman-phile. I noticed something missing from lists that
contained Marian and Early Imperial Romans. Fulcum. That's right,
there are three lists in CW that contain either Marian or Early
Imperial Romans that are not covered by the fulcum rules. I realize
that making these lists are a monumental effort and perhaps this was
considered but what the heck, I thought I'd bring it up anyway as no
one is infallable (spelling?). Here are the lists and their
particulars. To begin with though, I feel it's important to note
that Warrior has determined that the Marian List start around 107 BC
and overlap the EIR around 25 BC and forward.
Classical Warrior lists that contain Marian/EIR. . .
6. Thracian Late period 24BC-46AD- This list slips into the EIR time
period.
28. Ptolemaic, Late Period. Some one please remind me, Julius
Caesar, Pompey, and Marcus Antony were in which period? Marian/EIR
Overlap?
36. Numidian 85 BC-16 AD, The Sublist is referred as the Roman Civil
Wars period hmmm...
Each of these lists have Romans from either the Marian or Early
Imperial time frames. This being the case, will you be making an
Errata to allow these Romans to use Fulcum? History is very
important to me. That is why I play these games. It is not my hope
to gain any advantage from having this errata brought up as I do not
play these armies but I feel that continuity of historical rules
structures must be maintained regardless of the "List Book" that is
created. Many of these lists overlap in periods and allies and
therefore should not be hosed. :)
Chargeholio
"By Uncle Spanky's Left Thumb!"
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|