Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[Mark Stone]

Question for the "List Ho":

In Feudal Warrior List 23, Post-Mongol Russian, it states that you can get 2
horse wagons as "separate transport", and refers the reader to section 13.313 of
Warrior. In section 13.313 it states that "Some separate transport units may be
used as Obstacles(7.5). This will be noted in army lists."

Well, there's no mention in the list that these wagons can be used as obstacles.
Is this an oversight? The evidence from Kulikovo, among other battles, is pretty
compelling that the "Gulai Gorod" was used as an obstacle.

If it is not an oversight, then what purpose do these wagons serve, since, again
from 13.313, separate transport "do not 'carry' other elements."


-Mark Stone

[scott holder]

I had thought it was clear that since they're included in the notes that they
could be used as obstacles. I'll add a little something in the next errata but
go ahead and use em as obstacles.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Stone [mailto:mark@...]
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2003 11:21 AM
To: warrior
Subject: [WarriorRules] Russian list question


Question for the "List Ho":

In Feudal Warrior List 23, Post-Mongol Russian, it states that you can get 2
horse wagons as "separate transport", and refers the reader to section 13.313 of
Warrior. In section 13.313 it states that "Some separate transport units may be
used as Obstacles(7.5). This will be noted in army lists."

Well, there's no mention in the list that these wagons can be used as obstacles.
Is this an oversight? The evidence from Kulikovo, among other battles, is pretty
compelling that the "Gulai Gorod" was used as an obstacle.

If it is not an oversight, then what purpose do these wagons serve, since, again
from 13.313, separate transport "do not 'carry' other elements."


-Mark Stone


To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/