 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2003 5:32 am Post subject: Scots common List |
 |
|
Jon and Scott,
Actually the Feudal Warrior list was what I was referring to.
Under the list rules, it says, "Lowland Yeomen always fight two ranks
in hand to-hand combat." And ofcourse the list shows them as LTS
armed. It seems to me that the list rule in the standard army list
would take precedence over that of the Fast Warrior list since it is
more recent. Shouldn't that be the case in as far as any games in
that system with said army?
Kelly
_________________ Roll down and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
scott holder Moderator


Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6073 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Mon Oct 20, 2003 4:21 pm Post subject: RE: Scots common List |
 |
|
Actually the Feudal Warrior list was what I was referring to.
Under the list rules, it says, "Lowland Yeomen always fight two ranks
in hand to-hand combat." And ofcourse the list shows them as LTS
armed. It seems to me that the list rule in the standard army list
would take precedence over that of the Fast Warrior list since it is
more recent. Shouldn't that be the case in as far as any games in
that system with said army?
>Until we post an changes to the Fast Warrior lists and list rules, the rules as
they exist right now are what you play.
_________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Tue Oct 21, 2003 3:29 am Post subject: RE: Scots common List |
 |
|
That's too bad, since these list rules are already fleshed out in "Feudal
Warrior by you. All that it would take to fix this is for the FHE folks to state
that Book List Rules always supercede Fast Warrior list rules since they are the
latest published knowledge. <-- And no this is not meant to be mean. I simply
was confused by the ruling at our tournament based on what I knew from the
Feudal Warrior Lists. Any ruling would not have changed the outcome of my game
as it was my choice of orders that undid me! I in no way wish to diminish my
excellent opponent's victory. I just was surprised by the fact that a fast
warrior list rule should take precedence over the researched and perhaps better
thought out list rule from an FHE product.
Respectfully,
kelly
"Holder, Scott" <Scott.Holder@...> wrote:
Actually the Feudal Warrior list was what I was referring to.
Under the list rules, it says, "Lowland Yeomen always fight two ranks
in hand to-hand combat." And ofcourse the list shows them as LTS
armed. It seems to me that the list rule in the standard army list
would take precedence over that of the Fast Warrior list since it is
more recent. Shouldn't that be the case in as far as any games in
that system with said army?
>Until we post an changes to the Fast Warrior lists and list rules, the rules as
they exist right now are what you play.
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll down and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|