| 
			
				|  | Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
 
 |  
 
	
		| View previous topic :: View next topic |  
		| Author | Message |  
		| Frank Gilson Moderator
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1568
 Location: Orange County California
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:08 pm    Post subject: Some replacement tactics... |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Various people have brought up replacing troops already in contact.
 
 In the past, this usually occurred by charging your mounted through
 your light infantry that was being beaten up by enemy mounted. Now,
 though, we also have the Roman infantry special rules.
 
 First off, the use of LI as a 'sponge'. LI units are some of the
 cheapest we have available to us, you also don't take wavers for
 routing LI. LI units also cover good frontage.
 
 Those facts all make LI something you can use to pin the opponent,
 do a little shooting, and absorb an enemy mounted charge. As long as
 the LI are not routing, or if they are routing, the enemy mounted
 are impetuous, then you can charge through your LI with your mounted
 and contact the enemy at significant advantage.
 
 Opposing enemy foot with LI isn't as successful, as you have to
 either waver or recall away from them when they get close
 enough...and if you stood to receive a charge your LI would likely
 vaporize on the spot in most cases. Also, there's a fair amount of
 enemy foot that your mounted don't want to contact...especially
 disordered from charging through your LI.
 
 This can be a reason to use upgraded LI...sometimes you want C
 morale plus shields, so they are less likely to rout (and can also
 charge away enemy shieldless LI).
 
 Now...for Romans...it has been mentioned, but I also encountered the
 problem in the mini-event at Cold Wars...where I really wanted to
 have a couple of units behind my legionary line...but given that
 they are close order foot and expensive, that cut my frontage down
 significantly...a bad thing!
 
 So, it is much harder to use Roman infantry and have back up units
 than to employ LI plus a reserve of lancers. You have to cut down
 the frontage somehow (terrain? superior skirmishers?) to properly
 employ the legionaries.
 
 Anybody have some good tactics for Romans?
 
 Frank Gilson
 
 
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| Larry Essick Legionary
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 461
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:26 pm    Post subject: Re: Some replacement tactics... |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Frank,
 
 I have thought about running LIR as D legions, fairly large, with
 small 2 element B class hanging around behind.  The idea is to be able
 to either mass together if needed or to exploit an exposed flank as
 legion A is recoiled and legion B advances.
 
 It is expensive, but running most of the troops as D morale frees up
 some points.
 
 Larry
 
 
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Mon Apr 19, 2004 10:37 pm    Post subject: Re: Some replacement tactics... |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| In a message dated 4/19/2004 3:08:36 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
 franktrevorgilson@... writes:
 
 > So, it is much harder to use Roman infantry and have back up units
 > than to employ LI plus a reserve of lancers. You have to cut down
 > the frontage somehow (terrain? superior skirmishers?) to
 > properly
 > employ the legionaries.
 >
 > Anybody have some good tactics for Romans?>>
 
 Having playtested the roman rules and having been helping a friend with his
 Marians (as well as eyeing an EIR of my own...) I have a couple thoughts on
 this.
 
 Romans in this post are those to whom the list rules apply.
 
 I think Romans need to cut down the board - you want to make the infantry work,
 so you need to have at least one flank under control terrain-wise.
 
 I think each of the lists gives you something to handle the opposite flank -
 which you choose depends on your style and whether the event is themed or open.
 
 I think the list rules should be looked at this way:
 Most useful - Fulcum
 next most used - swordsman
 least used, but good to have - circulation.
 
 I think taking 2E HI units with generals in the Marian list is the way to go -
 they can provide support and either circulate or provide a charge on something
 near the flanks of the line legionaries.
 
 I think HI with the list rules should all forced march.  What is 2FP to a roman?
 
 I think the line should be interspersed with lancers and small loose order units
 to keep skirmishers from stopping your line.  A homogenous roman line will die
 to lancer/LMI pairs (fulcum-charged by LMI, out of fulcum, charged by lancer),
 but is very effective when using combined arms of its own.
 
 I think using circulation will fail if a player tries to rely on it and/or force
 it.  I think there should be 2-4 x 2E units in the list that are capable of it,
 generals if possible, to be ready to act on situations, but that some sort of
 line of 4E units behind 4E units is neither historical nor tourney-practical.
 It should also be remembered that the list rule permits bringing forward JLS
 armed figs in the same body to fight subsequent bounds.  This can be very useful
 against certain opponents, especially in period.
 
 Jon
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  |  
		| Back to top |  |  
		|  |  
		|  |  
  
	| 
 
 | You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum
 You cannot edit your posts in this forum
 You cannot delete your posts in this forum
 You cannot vote in polls in this forum
 You cannot attach files in this forum
 You cannot download files in this forum
 
 |  
 Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
 
 |