| Frank Gilson Moderator
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1568
 Location: Orange County California
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Apr 06, 2005 7:29 pm    Post subject: Re: Swiss Pike rules question - Disclaimer (I''m not Jon or |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| DISCLAIMER : I'm not Jon Cleaves, nor am I Scott Holder.
 
 I am also not really going to answer the question, just try to
 interpret it given the rules section in question and the Swiss
 infantry rules.
 
 The Swiss infantry rulse as written in Feudal Warrior do not address
 the issue of Swiss and 11.212. Updates on the Four Horsemen website
 to Feudal Warrior do not modify this.
 
 11.212 Winning and Losing:
 A body that recives MORE hand-to-hand casualties than it inflicted
 and at LEAST 1 CPF is destroyed if artillery, or if exhauseted. If
 it is not:
 - Foot fighting mounted troops recoil and become disordered, unless
 the mounted break-off or rout.
 - Other light troops must break-off.
 - Other mounted or loose formation troops must either break-off or
 recoil.
 - Other pike-armed foot recoil if already disordered, otherwise
 become disordered.
 - Other troops must recoil.
 
 Currently I believe we execute these steps in order from top to
 bottom. Let's think about a LC unit. Technically if you were to look
 at these steps all at once, then the LC unit is in conflict
 between "Other light troops must break-off" and "Other mounted or
 loose formation troops must either break-off or recoil".
 
 So, we go from top to bottom and the LC unit must break-off.
 
 Applying this to Swiss infantry, as "Other mounted or loose..." is
 before "Other pike-armed...", then the Swiss either break-off or
 recoil, not disorder.
 
 However, this does not take into account any statements or rulings
 previously made concerning Swiss infantry.
 
 I am also not one of the rules authors and have no connection with
 their insight.
 
 Frank Gilson
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "siwardrocks" <geoffcrick@o...>
 wrote:
 >
 > Any update on this question?
 >
 > Cheers....Geoff
 >
 > --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "siwardrocks"
 <geoffcrick@o...>
 > wrote:
 > >
 > > I remember seeing a while back where it was stated that Swiss
 pikemen
 > > become disordered when defeated in H To H combat.
 > > Section 11.212 of the rules is contradictory in that it states
 that
 > > loose formation foot recoil or break off. The next line then
 says that
 > > Pikemen become disordered without recoil if not already
 disordered..
 > > Does this mean that they become disordered and then either
 recoil or
 > > break off? Does it mean that they behave like close formation
 and
 > > become disordered without recoil if not already disordered?
 > > Can this be clarified please.
 > >
 > >
 > > Cheers...........Geoff
 
 
 |  |