| View previous topic :: View next topic | 
	
	
		| Author | Message | 
	
		| Chris Bump Legate
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1625
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 3:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| In a message dated 2/6/2004 10:25:24 AM Central Standard Time,
 spocksleftball@... writes:
 As I was gaming the other night, my opponant was running an army that
 I found very tough to approach.  2HCT/Pa armed HI were particularly
 troublesome.  They are basically shot on the -1 or 0 factor.  Does
 anyone have any ideas of confronting them?
 The Mission of Infantry, used even today, still pertains.  The Infantry
 closes with the enemy by means of fire and maneuver in order to destroy or to
 capture him or to repel his assault by fire, close combat, and counter attack.
 
 Chris
 
 
 [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 6:36 pm    Post subject: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| As I was gaming the other night, my opponant was running an army that
 I found very tough to approach.  2HCT/Pa armed HI were particularly
 troublesome.  They are basically shot on the -1 or 0 factor.  Does
 anyone have any ideas of confronting them?
 
 Wanax
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 7:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| In a message dated 2/6/2004 10:36:12 AM Eastern Standard Time,
 spocksleftball@... writes:
 
 > As I was gaming the other night, my opponant was running an army that
 > I found very tough to approach.  2HCT/Pa armed HI were particularly
 > troublesome.  They are basically shot on the -1 or 0
 > factor.  Does
 > anyone have any ideas of confronting them?>>
 
 HTW works.  So does L.  Pa - equipped troops have to have someone nearby to save
 them on their second bound of combat.  They make a nice one bound blocking
 force, but if you get them alone, any shock troop will kill them.
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:14 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
 > HTW works.  So does L.  Pa - equipped troops have to have someone
 nearby to save them on their second bound of combat.  They make a
 nice one bound blocking force, but if you get them alone, any shock
 troop will kill them.
 
 Yes and perhaps that was my distraction in the game.  Had I put my
 LHI 2hcw/sh on them, then perhaps I'd have caught him standing to
 face my impetuous charge 9@6=45 to his 8@5=32 and 4@3=10.  All dice
 being equal, I'll get good odds against his shieldless MI rear rank
 in the second bound, but I will be taking doulbe HTH casualties so
 will have to dispatch him within a couple of bounds or become a
 liability to my own troops.
 
 I looked at the HTW factors, but they didn't look that good to me in
 the second bound.  Take a Roman 4E RgB HI HTW/J/sh; 12@6=60 since the
 impet enemy charge cancels mine.  His charge hits with 8@7=48 and
 4@5=16 for a total of 64.  the Romans take more and recoil
 disordered.   In the second bound I think the Romans will go away
 12@0 or 12, while the 2HCT guys do -3 for tired and disordered  with
 8@3=20 and 4@1=6, so 26 or 1 CPF on the Romans.  Second combat
 disorder for the Romans prompts a waver.  Perhaps I'm not calculating
 correctly, or I've missed something you see Jon?
 
 I also didn't really think about the HK L/sh factors on the 2HCT (4E
 IrgC HI/MI 2HCT/J Pa):  5@6=25 or 1 CPF to a 16 man unit. coming back
 he gets 4@3 and 3@2 or 16.  the HK follow up/expand and are now
 tired, while the HI are recoiled disordered.  Next bound HK fight
 6@5=24, while the now MI fight 8@3 and 4@1 for 26.  The HK are now
 going to break off tired with 10 CPF total and the infantry will
 rally forward disordered.  I don't know why I didn't consider pushing
 the knights into them myself :)
 
 Of course in the second bound it when the other unit should hit the
 infantry I know, but I like the above scenario just fine.
 
 Food for thought, thanks Jon
 Wanax
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:20 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, cncbump@a... wrote:
 > The Mission of Infantry, used even today, still pertains.  The
 Infantry
 > closes with the enemy by means of fire and maneuver in order to
 destroy or to
 > capture him or to repel his assault by fire, close combat, and
 counter attack.
 >
 > Chris
 
 I spent most of my military carrier in the infantry, so I am familiar
 with our lot in life.  However to "close with and destroy the enemy"
 which is how it is actually spelled out for us dumb grunts (read non-
 officer types), didn't work for me this last game.  The problem as
 Jon perhaps aluded to, was that I used by close order to confront his
 rather than my shock troops.  I would have been better served by
 allowing my close order infantry to absorbe his missile fire.
 Lessons learned :)
 
 BTW, the infantry repel "his" assault with the radio usually
   Wanax
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 10:31 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| In a message dated 2/6/2004 2:14:13 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 spocksleftball@... writes:
 
 > Perhaps I'm not calculating
 > correctly, or I've missed something you see Jon?>>
 
 Pa cannot be used in hand to hand.....  Your romans slay those guys on the
 second bound...
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:22 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| I got it now.  I calculated as sheildless, but the English are now
 disordered shieldless MI from the second rank so are a 6 factor not
 4.  Sorry.  This will recoil the English but not cause a second
 disorder.  the English will be sitting at around 12 CPF and the
 Romans around 6 going into the third bound.
 Wanax
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
 > In a message dated 2/6/2004 2:14:13 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 spocksleftball@y... writes:
 >
 > > Perhaps I'm not calculating
 > > correctly, or I've missed something you see Jon?>>
 >
 > Pa cannot be used in hand to hand.....  Your romans slay those guys
 on the second bound...
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| joncleaves Moderator
 
  
  
 Joined: 29 Mar 2006
 Posts: 16447
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2004 11:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Ok, Boyd.  If 12@6 isn't disordering these guys, they must be at least 6E and in
 a 3x2 block.  If that's true then you don't kill them with just one unit of 4E,
 since you'd be outnumbered...lol
 
 
 _________________
 Roll Up and Win!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 7:57 pm    Post subject: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| You are facing the following army just deployed by your opponant:
 
 5x 2E IrgA/B HK/HC L/sh
 2x 2E RgC LC B/sh
 12E IrgC HI/MI/MI JLS/sh B
 6E IrgC HI/MI/MI LTS/sh CB
 12E IrgD LMI B/IPW
 6E IrgD LI B
 6E LHI 2HCW/JLS/sh
 
 There is a small wood on one flank and a hill on the other.  The IrgD
 LMI are on the hill while the LHI are pointed at the wood.  The LI
 have been forced marched to the center of the board.  The close order
 infantry are flanked by K who are again flanked by LC.
 
 How would you approached neutralizing this armies obvious shock
 troops while avoiding the energy sponge HI?
 
 Please indicate if you are using EL/LMI or LMI/SHK or some other
 combo army.  Bear in mind the LHI would come out of the woods if EL
 were present and other tactically obvious counter ploys.
 
 TIA
 Wanax
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Todd Schneider Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 904
 Location: Kansas City
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Tue Feb 17, 2004 10:18 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| OK, Maybe it's just me, but I am having a hard time
 visualizing the setup as you described it.
 
 If you could, and if you'd like, can you send me an
 email describing the setup from say Your Table left to
 Table right?  I can put in on a powerpoint slide and
 post it to the group, or make it a gif or jpeg for
 those without powerpoint.
 
 I think This is an interesting excercise!
 
 Todd
 Thresh1642@...
 
 
 --- spocksleftball <spocksleftball@...> wrote:
 
 ---------------------------------
 You are facing the following army just deployed by
 your opponant:
 
 5x 2E IrgA/B HK/HC L/sh
 2x 2E RgC LC B/sh
 12E IrgC HI/MI/MI JLS/sh B
 6E IrgC HI/MI/MI LTS/sh CB
 12E IrgD LMI B/IPW
 6E IrgD LI B
 6E LHI 2HCW/JLS/sh
 
 There is a small wood on one flank and a hill on the
 other.  The IrgD
 LMI are on the hill while the LHI are pointed at the
 wood.  The LI
 have been forced marched to the center of the board.
 The close order
 infantry are flanked by K who are again flanked by LC.
 
 How would you approached neutralizing this armies
 obvious shock
 troops while avoiding the energy sponge HI?
 
 Please indicate if you are using EL/LMI or LMI/SHK or
 some other
 combo army.  Bear in mind the LHI would come out of
 the woods if EL
 were present and other tactically obvious counter
 ploys.
 
 TIA
 Wanax
 
 
 
 ---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
 Terms of Service.
 
 
 _________________
 Finding new and interesting ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory almost every game!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:17 am    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| I created a PPt slide in the files section called EC 7th.
 Wanax
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, Todd Schneider <thresh1642@s...>
 wrote:
 > OK, Maybe it's just me, but I am having a hard time
 > visualizing the setup as you described it.
 >
 > If you could, and if you'd like, can you send me an
 > email describing the setup from say Your Table left to
 > Table right?  I can put in on a powerpoint slide and
 > post it to the group, or make it a gif or jpeg for
 > those without powerpoint.
 >
 > I think This is an interesting excercise!
 >
 > Todd
 > Thresh1642@a...
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Todd Schneider Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 904
 Location: Kansas City
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:25 am    Post subject: Re: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Thanks.
 
 Todd
 
 
 --- spocksleftball <spocksleftball@...> wrote:
 
 ---------------------------------
 I created a PPt slide in the files section called EC
 7th.
 Wanax
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, Todd Schneider
 <thresh1642@s...>
 wrote:
 > OK, Maybe it's just me, but I am having a hard time
 > visualizing the setup as you described it.
 >
 > If you could, and if you'd like, can you send me an
 > email describing the setup from say Your Table left
 to
 > Table right?  I can put in on a powerpoint slide and
 > post it to the group, or make it a gif or jpeg for
 > those without powerpoint.
 >
 > I think This is an interesting excercise!
 >
 > Todd
 > Thresh1642@a...
 
 
 
 
 ---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
 Terms of Service.
 
 
 _________________
 Finding new and interesting ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory almost every game!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Todd Schneider Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 904
 Location: Kansas City
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 12:46 am    Post subject: Re: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| Also, thats a 1600 point Army you have out on the
 table, right?
 
 Todd
 
 
 
 
 --- spocksleftball <spocksleftball@...> wrote:
 
 ---------------------------------
 I created a PPt slide in the files section called EC
 7th.
 Wanax
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, Todd Schneider
 <thresh1642@s...>
 wrote:
 > OK, Maybe it's just me, but I am having a hard time
 > visualizing the setup as you described it.
 >
 > If you could, and if you'd like, can you send me an
 > email describing the setup from say Your Table left
 to
 > Table right?  I can put in on a powerpoint slide and
 > post it to the group, or make it a gif or jpeg for
 > those without powerpoint.
 >
 > I think This is an interesting excercise!
 >
 > Todd
 > Thresh1642@a...
 
 
 
 
 ---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
 Terms of Service.
 
 
 
 
 ---------------------------------
 Yahoo! Groups Links
 
 To visit your group on the web, go to:
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/WarriorRules/
 
 To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
 WarriorRules-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
 
 Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo!
 Terms of Service.
 
 
 _________________
 Finding new and interesting ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of Victory almost every game!
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		| Centurion
 
  
 
 Joined: 12 Apr 2006
 Posts: 1373
 
 
 | 
			
				|  Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2004 3:56 pm    Post subject: Re: Tacticals |  |  
				| 
 |  
				| No this is 1200pt
 
 --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, Todd Schneider <thresh1642@s...>
 wrote:
 > Also, thats a 1600 point Army you have out on the
 > table, right?
 >
 > Todd
 
 
 |  | 
	
		| Back to top |  | 
	
		|  | 
	
		|  |