Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

You buys your rules, you rolls your dice, and you
takes your chances. We are all glad to be here. We
reserve the right to piss and moan, er, express
dismay. Don't get me started on Trapezetoi. Smirk.
Snicker. Snort. Bad shakes to the thought police.
Smooch.

--- DBeeson <dbeeson@...> wrote:
> Eric,
> Real "quite men" are usually asleep, perhaps these
> "quite men" should think
> about also joining Yahoo's sleep walking group.
> One man's S & N comments just might be another man's
> lively conversation.
> I know e-mail is a poor way to speak to someone, you
> can't see the smile on
> his face or the twinkle in his eye to know if he is
> putting you on or not.
> I also don't think one man should question another
> man's sincerity if he
> does not know him.
> I hope this did not offend, it's just one man's
> opinion.
> David
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "wdknee88" <eturner@...>
> To: <WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 16, 2003 8:13 PM
> Subject: [WarriorRules] Re: Sarcastic and Negative
> Comments since msg #43
>
>
> > Wonderfully said. I agree completely.
> >
> > The individuals should learn "A quiet man is
> heared more often than
> > the man who comments on every subject"
> >
> > Eric Turner
> > no relation.
> >
> >
> > --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, "turner1118"
> <Turnerm@l...> wrote:
> > > As someone who has helped the FH in a couple
> ways and followed all of
> > > this since early 2000 I have noted the vocal
> minority.
> > >
> > > The people who usually start their e-mails, "You
> guys are great, next
> > > best thing since sliced bread, BUT......" and
> then go on to tell the
> > > FH how they screwed this up, or got this wrong,
> or generally aren't
> > > doing what that individual wants done on a
> specific list and/or rule.
> > >
> > > Following all of these e-mails for over 3 years
> it is the same old 5
> > > or 6 people, and for a couple of them, at the
> best of times they are
> > > only sarcastic but at the worst they are very
> negative remarks.
> > >
> > > Having noted that this style of commenting is
> the norm on other
> > > Ancients groups, that use the same basing
> system, maybe those
> > > individuals would be better served playing that
> game vice Warrior,
> > > their comments would certainly be the norm
> rather than the minority.
> > > Warrior at present contains over 300 members,
> but week to week (for 3
> > > years) the same individuals come on and make
> backhanded comments and
> > > criticize a rule or list item.
> > >
> > > What is the purpose of most of these comments?
> FHE have already made
> > > a decision, they are not changing the rule, the
> list.... or the fact
> > > that Moogs have shields. IF the decision has
> already been made,
> > > these comments are only meant to HURT Warrior,
> not help Warrior. Is
> > > that what these individuals are all about?
> > >
> > > These people are the MINORITY, unfortunately
> they are very vocal.
> > > There are people joining the group every week,
> many new players, who
> > > in some cases have switched to Warrior because
> their old system was
> > > wracked with negative comments and attitudes.
> > >
> > > To new people and old joing the group, Welcome,
> I believe the
> > > Majority are very happy with what FHE has done,
> and I say that
> > > without having to add several cents of sarcasm
> or negativity,
> > >
> > > VR,
> > > Mike Turner
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> > WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
> >
> >
> >
> > Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
> >
> >
> >
>
>


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Protect your identity with Yahoo! Mail AddressGuard
http://antispam.yahoo.com/whatsnewfree