Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

Mark Mallard · Posted: Tue Aug 12, 2003 4:01 pm Post subject: Re: Warrior Clinc 4 Subject

In a message dated 8/12/03 4:35:39 PM GMT Daylight Time, JonCleaves@...
writes:

> It's time for another Warrior clinic, boys. Is there any particular
> subject you'd like me to write about?
>
> J
>

How about rallying troops from rout.

I got my CinC to a router today but there was enemy within 240 paces... i had
hoped to get rid of this enemy during combat but failed to ..the game was
then adjourned... i have yet to check whether the routers continue or what ..
diverting around the CinC.

mark

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

It's time for another Warrior clinic, boys. Is there any particular subject
you'd like me to write about?

J

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

<<How about rallying troops from rout.>>

You mean recover, of course. :)

I'll do a clinic on recovery unless there's a bunch of votes for another topic.

Recruit Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 234

Jon,

My vote would be something more in the line of your clinic on camps. I would
appreciate information on how to deal with things which are unusual (at
least for me), like:

Crazy troop types (elephants, chariots, scythed chariots)

Fortifications, obstacles, etc. (at Historicon and Cold Wars I had people
put down obstacles and not know how units could move across them, units
being slowed, disordered, ...)

Maybe the use of artillery and hand guns

As someone who only gets to play at conventions, I don¹t get a chance to see
these things in Œregular¹ gaming and they are rare enough to not see them
often in tournaments. What happens then is that I never really have learned
how to deal with them properly to begin with and I end up not sure what to
do when I do see them.

Thanks.

-- Charles

> <<How about rallying troops from rout.>>
>
> You mean recover, of course. Smile

>
> I'll do a clinic on recovery unless there's a bunch of votes for another
> topic.
>
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=244522.3656190.4921519.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705059080
> :HM/A=1595056/R=0/SIG=124ps9ikp/*http://ashnin.com/clk/muryutaitakenattogyo?YH
> =3656190&yhad=1595056>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

Jon,

My vote would be something more in the line of your clinic on camps. I would
appreciate information on how to deal with things which are unusual (at
least for me), like:

Crazy troop types (elephants, chariots, scythed chariots)

Fortifications, obstacles, etc. (at Historicon and Cold Wars I had people
put down obstacles and not know how units could move across them, units
being slowed, disordered, ...)

Maybe the use of artillery and hand guns>>

Ok, so which? lol I'll get to all of them eventually, I need to know which is
next. Rank order your choices, would ya? Thanks.

J

Tim Brown · Legionary Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 326

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> It's time for another Warrior clinic, boys. Is there any
particular subject you'd like me to write about?
>
> J

Hmmm... how about the use of generals and their particular nuances
with regards to joining, combat, recovering routers, and the like.
Add in banners - what is required, strength and weakness of each
type, perhaps.

Tim Brown

Patrick Byrne · Centurion Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1433

You all are wimps. Your Generals should be fighting and in the combat!

How about a Warrior clinic on the nuances of fighting supported, unsupported
and how Generals who actually fight provide will and eagerness to the rest
of the Army.

PS - You're summary paragraph can be why my general always breaks first.
PPS - My best battle ever was facing Mr. Regets when My CNC broke in bound
3. Every other unit passed the waver checks! (some wacky total like 14 or
15!).
PPPS - Most of this is just in jest, except the PPS and thought about the
Warrior clinic.

-PB

> From: "browntj007" <browntj007@...>
> Reply-To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 18:44:14 -0000
> To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [WarriorRules] Re: Warrior Clinc 4 Subject
>
> --- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
>> It's time for another Warrior clinic, boys. Is there any
> particular subject you'd like me to write about?
>>
>> J
>
>
> Hmmm... how about the use of generals and their particular nuances
> with regards to joining, combat, recovering routers, and the like.
> Add in banners - what is required, strength and weakness of each
> type, perhaps.
>
> Tim Brown
>

--------------------------------------------------------

This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain confidential,
privileged, proprietary, or otherwise private information. If you have received
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete the
message. Any other use, disclosure or publication of the message by you is
prohibited.

Recruit Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 24

Jon,

My vote would be for dealing with obstacles.

The last couple of tournaments that I've been in have had Stone Walls
and Ditched Palisades. Hadn't run into those in the past and don't
really have a good solution for them.

2nd choice - with the the addition of several more lists that have
cart mounted artillary. It'd be nice to get some ideas on how to
deal with them (regular Art I can handle, but it's the swivel and
shoot that gets me).

Gilles

--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> Jon,
>
> My vote would be something more in the line of your clinic on
camps. I would
> appreciate information on how to deal with things which are unusual
(at
> least for me), like:
>
> Crazy troop types (elephants, chariots, scythed chariots)
>
> Fortifications, obstacles, etc. (at Historicon and Cold Wars I had
people
> put down obstacles and not know how units could move across them,
units
> being slowed, disordered, ...)
>
> Maybe the use of artillery and hand guns>>
>
> Ok, so which? lol I'll get to all of them eventually, I need to
know which is next. Rank order your choices, would ya? Thanks.
>
> J

Kelly Wilkinson · Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 5:59 am Post subject: Re: Re: Warrior Clinc 4 Subject

That's a great idea, Tim! I would be for a "brush-up" on that.
Kelly

browntj007 <browntj007@...> wrote:
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> It's time for another Warrior clinic, boys. Is there any
particular subject you'd like me to write about?
>
> J

Hmmm... how about the use of generals and their particular nuances
with regards to joining, combat, recovering routers, and the like.
Add in banners - what is required, strength and weakness of each
type, perhaps.

Tim Brown

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Todd Kaeser · Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 3:55 pm Post subject: Re: Warrior Clinc 4 Subject

My vote is for the field fortifications.

Todd K

__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com

Greg Regets · Imperator Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2988

I vote for field fortifications also.

Single element or unit generals, is sort of a no-brainer.

Greg

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

My vote is for the field fortifications.

Todd K>>

My plan is this:

I am recording each separate 'vote' in the order it arrived. When I get back to
the US, I am going to sit down and take the one with the most votes (earliest in
breaks ties) and do it and then do the rest in order as time goes on.

J

joncleaves · Moderator Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447

<<Single element or unit generals, is sort of a no-brainer.>>

Hmm, I must have no brain. I always make my choice depending on the army and
army size and not always the same choice is made.

Those of you like me have no fear, a general-based Warrior clinic will get done.

J

Recruit Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 234

I will join in and vote for field fortifications as well.

> My vote is for the field fortifications.
>
> Todd K
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
> http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com
>
> Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
>
> ADVERTISEMENT
>
> <http://rd.yahoo.com/M=259538.3705203.4965331.1261774/D=egroupweb/S=1705059080
> :HM/A=1712983/R=0/SIG=11u38u3s2/*http://hits.411web.com/cgi-bin/hit?page=1374-
> 105951838331032>
>
> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service
> <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> .

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Kelly Wilkinson · Posted: Wed Aug 13, 2003 8:01 pm Post subject: Re: Re: Warrior Clinc 4 Subject

I would be for field fortifications if we could also talk about Pavises used as
an obstacle such as those used by the Achaemenid Persians.

Greg Regets <gar@...> wrote:I vote for field fortifications also.

Single element or unit generals, is sort of a no-brainer.

Greg

Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT

To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]