Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[joncleaves]

Warrior Skirmish will be a game where the figures represent individuals.
There will not be any mutli-figure bases, therefore.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

In a message dated 8/17/02 6:28:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
JonCleaves@... writes:

<< Subj: Re: [WarriorRules] Warrior Skrimish?
Date: 8/17/02 6:28:17 AM Pacific Daylight Time
From: JonCleaves@...
Reply-to: <A HREF="mailto:WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com">
WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com</A>
To: WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com

Warrior Skirmish will be a game where the figures represent individuals.
There will not be any mutli-figure bases, therefore.
>>


Fantasy skirmish might not be a bad idea either.

John

[joncleaves]

In a message dated 8/17/2002 08:52:54 Central Daylight Time,
johncarroll453@... writes:


> Fantasy skirmish might not be a bad idea either.
>
> John
>

We will have rules for both, of course.


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

I still have a couple of different 15 mm armies and a 25 mm
Byzantine based for WRG VI (the rest of my 25's are based
for WRG VI but are fantasy forces never found in any legit
army list *v*). Their age and relative condition can be
easily deduced from the fact that WRG VI was the "new" list
in those days ....

I've been avidly following this list, simply because my
memory of VII indicated that it handled all the objections
and hassles I've heard connected with DBx stuff -- and of
course I dream of returning to the conventions (my
unfortunately dubious health permitting). However, I hadn't
purchased my Warriors stuff yet simply because, well, WRG
VII was not in "my" scale. I had become enamoured of the
appearance of the formations and maneuvers in VI ....
So, will "skirmish" once again renew that arena as Warriors
seems to have done for the larger scale???
hope ... hope ... hope ...
(and how much rebasing am I in for?)
Sincerely,
Arthur

--
IN HOC MODO MILLIS FRANGITVR .