Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules

[srawls]

Scott -

While discussing the Arab Imperial list (DAW16) with Jamie White, he noticed that some of the point totals didn't seem correct. I sat down and double checked them and I believe he is correct.

The final list note states that all Arab cavalry is camel proof. That seems to be where the problem lies.

Pg 32 LIne 2: The sub-generals are cost at 81 pts, which would be correct for a HC L, Sh RB Sub w/ a P standard. Making the element camel proof should adjust the cost to 84 pts.

Pg 32 Line 7: This line addresses the mounting the Arab and Dailami infantry on camels. The costs listed are correct, but it lists the cost for mounting the Arab MI on camels as 4 pts. This is totally correct if they are irregular, but not if they are regular as they can be in the list. Or is the intention only to allow the Irregular Arab foot to be mounted? It's unclear in the list.

Pg32 Early Period Line 1: The Arab Jund HC is costed at 33 pts in the book, which would be correct by my math if they were RC HC L, Sh that was camel proof. The errata for the list changes the cost to 30 pts. The cost difference seems to be the camel proofing. Does the list errata remove the camel proofing from this line?

Tks,
Steve Rawls

[Mark Stone]

[srawls]

You are correct. I see where I made the error. That's what I get for working off of very sketchy notes.
Steve Rawls