View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
browntj007 Recruit


Joined: 07 Jul 2006 Posts: 21 Location: NY
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 2:53 am Post subject: Interpenetration question |
 |
|
Jon,
When a unit is replaced in combat, according to 6.523 the body replaced is moved to behind the charger...now say that you have a 16 man LMI unit in a 2 x 2 formation attacked by 6 man cav unit in column. The cav win and recoil the LMI, expanding in the process. Another LMI unit, aka Aztec for instance, can legally interpenetrate and is in a 1 x 2 column. THe question: do the cav maintain contact with the one element not replaced, or in essense does the entire unit replaced 'break contact' and in the combat round 1 element of cav fights the new unit 1 x 2 column front element only? My opinion is the rule says 'body' and not by element, and thus the whole unit is replaced, but I don't see it played that way.
Tim |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Tue Feb 27, 2007 5:51 am Post subject: |
 |
|
The cav maintain contact with the element not replaced.
J _________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: combat replacement |
 |
|
Jon,
Let's say a unit of Aztecs (unit"A")in a 2x2 formation is replaced in combat by a 1x2 unit(unit"B") but maintains contact with one of it's front elements wtih the enemy. What does this formation look like? Does unit "A" become a column or is it somehow placed behind the elements that just replaced it in combat?
Kelly |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Fri Mar 16, 2007 5:13 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Temporarily placed behind. _________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|