|
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
scott holder Moderator
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6055 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2014 11:42 am Post subject: Deployment Rules |
|
|
DEPLOYMENT
Pre-Set Terrain; Table Assignment: Tables with pre-set terrain will be assigned to players at random for each round of games.
Players may wind up playing on the same table more than once.
Mongol player can dice to pick up two pieces of terrain, using usual Mongol List Rules, modified by climate, after players have chosen table side.
Choice of Table Edge. Players dice for table edge, high roll choosing the side, die roll of player with more scouting points (SPs) modified as follows:
3:1 or more SPs @ +4
2:1 or more SPs (but fewer than 3:1) @ +3
more SPs (but fewer than 2:1) @ +2
Deployment Order of Commands:
After both players have written deployment orders, an out-scouted player deploys all commands first, then the out-scouting player deploys all commands.
If neither player out-scouts the other, the player with fewer SPs deploys their first command; players then alternate in deploying commands. (A different method outlined below can be used in place of the one described in this bullet)
Commands are deployed in order of size, largest to smallest, measured by army point total in each command.
If more than one command has the same point total, player chooses which to deploy first.
Camp does not count for command size, but may be deployed with any command.
Deployment - Zones. The zones in which forces deploy vary by the ratio of players SPs.
3:1 or more = lesser force deploys up to 360p from baseline, greater force deploys up to the centerline
2:1 or more (but fewer than 3:1) = lesser force deploys up to 240p from the centerline, greater force deploys up to the centerline
Less than 2:1 = both forces deploy up to 120p from the centerline
There is no force marching/fatigue points for deploying in the forward zone, where allowed to do so by SP ratio
Either player may conceal units as an ambush in their deployment area, even if the player is out-scouted and the ambush is in the forward zone
Artillery and such which deployes further than 240p from the base edge of the table, still counts as if it force marched for shooting eligibility purposes only.
DIFFERENT METHOD FOR PLACING COMMANDS
When placing commands, players first dice before each command placement pairing (one command each) to determine who places the appropriate command first.
Side 1 has more but not double scouting of Side 2. Side 1's command placement die rolls are +1
Side 1 has double but not triple scouting. Side 1's command placement die rolls are +2
Side 1 has triple more more scouting. Side 1's command placement die rolls are +3. _________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint!
Last edited by scott holder on Tue Oct 26, 2021 7:30 pm; edited 5 times in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frank Gilson Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1563 Location: Orange County California
|
Posted: Tue Jun 23, 2015 12:17 pm Post subject: Command Size change |
|
|
Note:
"Commands are deployed in order of size, largest to smallest, measured by number of units."
Is no longer correct. It is size, largest to smallest, measured by ARMY POINT TOTAL in each command.
That's been how we have played it for a bit now, and helps reduce 'fiddly' bits even more. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Stone Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2102 Location: Buckley, WA
|
Posted: Wed Jun 24, 2015 3:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for pointing this out, Frank. I hadn't noticed this and I'll factor it into my command organization. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
theblackprince Recruit
Joined: 21 Nov 2018 Posts: 24
|
Posted: Thu Aug 22, 2019 7:51 pm Post subject: Two questions on this |
|
|
1. I've heard that in cases where one side is outscounted 3-1+, they can "forcemarch" a unit for 2 fatigue up to 240p from the center line (instead of just the 360p from your rear edge). Looking for inclusion of this formally.
2. Treatment of the Mongol terrain removal list rule. Oriental Warrior says "the Mongol player (who has 2x scouting points) may replace one of his terrain rolls by picking up etc." This to me reads that no die is rolled (you replace the roll itself), and the terrain is simply picked up.
As this list rule is translated to current deployment rules, looks like from this that the Mongol has to roll a 3-6 (2-6 if in home climate) to actually pick something up for each of his two die rolls. Is this in fact how this works?
Thanks |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frank Gilson Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1563 Location: Orange County California
|
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 11:09 am Post subject: Re: Two questions on this |
|
|
theblackprince wrote: |
1. I've heard that in cases where one side is outscounted 3-1+, they can "forcemarch" a unit for 2 fatigue up to 240p from the center line (instead of just the 360p from your rear edge). Looking for inclusion of this formally.
2. Treatment of the Mongol terrain removal list rule. Oriental Warrior says "the Mongol player (who has 2x scouting points) may replace one of his terrain rolls by picking up etc." This to me reads that no die is rolled (you replace the roll itself), and the terrain is simply picked up.
As this list rule is translated to current deployment rules, looks like from this that the Mongol has to roll a 3-6 (2-6 if in home climate) to actually pick something up for each of his two die rolls. Is this in fact how this works?
Thanks |
The rules apply, except when they dont. That is, if the deployment rules notes here contradict the rules, then these win when they are noted to apply.
Id they dont, or do not cover something, then the rules still apply.
So, you can Force March...just as noted in the rules.
As for the Mongol terrain removal...as they need to use an actual Open Space to remove terrain, and would have had to roll a die in the old terrain selection system, they must do so in the case of preset terrain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Stone Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2102 Location: Buckley, WA
|
Posted: Fri Aug 23, 2019 9:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Perhaps we could get some updated language on the Mongol rule? A literal reading of "may replace one of his terrain rolls" would be that no such replacement can occur since no terrain rolls occur in a tournament with pre-set terrain. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scott holder Moderator
Joined: 30 Mar 2006 Posts: 6055 Location: Bonnots Mill, MO
|
Posted: Tue Oct 26, 2021 7:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Note in original post, we now have a PDF for handy local usage.
Thanks to Dan Woyke for putting that together.
scott _________________ These Rules Suck, Let's Paint! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Frank Gilson Moderator
Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1563 Location: Orange County California
|
Posted: Thu May 12, 2022 3:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
Mark Stone wrote: |
Perhaps we could get some updated language on the Mongol rule? A literal reading of "may replace one of his terrain rolls" would be that no such replacement can occur since no terrain rolls occur in a tournament with pre-set terrain. |
I think this has been stated, but a Mongol player who otherwise meets the list rule requirements, can dice twice to pick up terrain from pre-set. Either one piece twice (having failed the first time) or two separate pieces.
Care should be taken to replace those pieces exactly upon game completion. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|