 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
joncleaves Moderator


Joined: 29 Mar 2006 Posts: 16447
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 7:49 pm Post subject: Re: Re: 1HCW |
 |
|
In a message dated 12/8/2003 11:35:03 AM Eastern Standard Time, gar@...
writes:
> But, the bases would be touching, and that somewhat implies
> "in the
> body", so the wording (to Kelly's point) is difficult.>>
Under the base rules, there are no horse bases to 'touch'. If the optional 6.64
is in play those aesthetic horse bases have NO game effect.
_________________ Roll Up and Win! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Mon Dec 08, 2003 10:28 pm Post subject: Re: 1HCW |
 |
|
Perhaps it might be wise to conisder a rewording of 5.221. Because
dismounted units still contain their mounts even if they are not on
them. According to this scripture, any unit containing these animals
are disordered by elepants/camels.
Kelly
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/8/2003 11:35:03 AM Eastern Standard Time,
gar@t... writes:
>
> > But, the bases would be touching, and that somewhat implies
> > "in the
> > body", so the wording (to Kelly's point) is difficult.>>
>
> Under the base rules, there are no horse bases to 'touch'. If the
optional 6.64 is in play those aesthetic horse bases have NO game
effect.
_________________ Roll down and Win! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kelly Wilkinson Dictator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 4172 Location: Raytown, MO
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2003 6:39 am Post subject: Re: Re: 1HCW |
 |
|
yes, I agree. It is nice to have one's questions answered and in a timely
manner! Thanks Jon for your help!
kelly w
Greg Regets <gar@...> wrote:
I COMPLETELY agree with your decisive ruling and logic that the SHI
would not disordered, as the horses are behind. Thank you!!
But, the bases would be touching, and that somewhat implies "in the
body", so the wording (to Kelly's point) is difficult.
Thanks for the ruling though Jon. In a forum where we somewhat badger
you to no end, I will say that I appreciate your decisive and timely
responses.
Thanks ... g
--- In WarriorRules@yahoogroups.com, JonCleaves@a... wrote:
> In a message dated 12/8/2003 10:55:26 AM Eastern Standard Time,
gar@t... writes:
>
> > Disorder by camels when dismounted.>>
>
> I assume by this you mean that you feel horses are 'in' a body of
SHI that is dismounted SHK, even though SHI contains no horses. I
can see the 'logic' behind that and that is why I am adding a
clarification on that one to the next update.
Yahoo! Groups SponsorADVERTISEMENT
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
WarriorRules-unsubscribe@egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
---------------------------------
Do you Yahoo!?
Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
_________________ Roll down and Win! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|