 |
Warrior Ancient and Medieval Rules A Four Horsemen Enterprises Rules Set
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Patrick Byrne Centurion

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 1433
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2001 4:00 am Post subject: 2nd Gap Question |
 |
|
Here is a very basic question.
If Unit A is moves into 120 paces to attack Unit X, then a GAP is created
(the whole minimum space existing between two things verbage). Now since one
shoulder of the GAP is unbroken enemy not fighting in HTH, can Unit A charge
Unit X. Per the rule Unit A can not charge through the GAP it created.
Now that question is basic, and it is bulls#@!.
So here is another one (and hopefully better):
Say that Unit A and Unit B are approaching enemy Unit X. Unit A approaches
within 120paces of that enemy Unit X, thus creating a GAP between the two
things!. Can Unit B charge through the Gap that Unit A created?
Per the rules you can not, unless Unit A is slightly angled so that the
closest points between the two Unit A and Unit X is on the far side of the
charge.
Truly having fun with this Barkerism
-PB
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Legionary

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 594
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2001 5:10 am Post subject: Re: 2nd Gap Question |
 |
|
I like you!
--- In WarriorRules@y..., Patrick Byrnes <cuan@f...> wrote:
> Here is a very basic question.
> If Unit A is moves into 120 paces to attack Unit X, then a GAP is
created
> (the whole minimum space existing between two things verbage). Now
since one
> shoulder of the GAP is unbroken enemy not fighting in HTH, can Unit
A charge
> Unit X. Per the rule Unit A can not charge through the GAP it
created.
>
> Now that question is basic, and it is bulls#@!.
1. Yep. It IS bull@#$% but it does conform to the letter of the
rules.
> So here is another one (and hopefully better):
> Say that Unit A and Unit B are approaching enemy Unit X. Unit A
approaches
> within 120paces of that enemy Unit X, thus creating a GAP between
the two
> things!. Can Unit B charge through the Gap that Unit A created?
>
> Per the rules you can not, unless Unit A is slightly angled so that
the
> closest points between the two Unit A and Unit X is on the far side
of the
> charge.
>
> Truly having fun with this Barkerism
> -PB
If unit B is behind Unit A and can interpenetrate, yes. But if we
adhere to the letter of the rules as above....... :P
You will notice that there is NO chapter in the rules called Common
Sense. ROTFLMAO
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
Don Coon Imperator

Joined: 12 Apr 2006 Posts: 2742
|
Posted: Wed Jun 27, 2001 5:21 am Post subject: Re: 2nd Gap Question |
 |
|
> Here is a very basic question.
> If Unit A is moves into 120 paces to attack Unit X, then a GAP is created
> (the whole minimum space existing between two things verbage). Now since
one
> shoulder of the GAP is unbroken enemy not fighting in HTH, can Unit A
charge
> Unit X. Per the rule Unit A can not charge through the GAP it created.
>
> Now that question is basic, and it is bulls#@!.
Nice conundrum dude! I wish I had seen that. Talk about a rules paradox!
Hey, how about "bodies that are declared as a target of a frontal charge do
not count for gap determination" I sound like a broken friken record here,
but it fixes this one too.
> So here is another one (and hopefully better):
> Say that Unit A and Unit B are approaching enemy Unit X. Unit A
approaches
> within 120paces of that enemy Unit X, thus creating a GAP between the two
> things!. Can Unit B charge through the Gap that Unit A created?
> Per the rules you can not, unless Unit A is slightly angled so that the
> closest points between the two Unit A and Unit X is on the far side of the
> charge.
See above all purpose rule cleanser! .
Don
|
|
Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group
|